Michael Shafto

885 total citations
40 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Michael Shafto is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Aerospace Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Shafto has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Michael Shafto's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (13 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (4 papers) and Aerospace and Aviation Technology (4 papers). Michael Shafto is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (13 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (4 papers) and Aerospace and Aviation Technology (4 papers). Michael Shafto collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Iran. Michael Shafto's co-authors include Colleen M. Seifert, Travis L. Seymour, Asaf Degani, Harold L. Hawkins, Pat Langley, Alex Kirlik, Richard M. Martin, Michael Freed, Robert N. Harris and Michaël Heymann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Shafto

38 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Shafto United States	12	322	245	122	105	72	40	609
Yvette J. Tenney United States	11	331 1.0×	91 0.4×	53 0.4×	23 0.2×	54 0.8×	15	583
Maha Salem United Kingdom	12	736 2.3×	137 0.6×	442 3.6×	23 0.2×	87 1.2×	30	1.0k
Xuhai Xu United States	20	132 0.4×	276 1.1×	160 1.3×	46 0.4×	178 2.5×	67	1.1k
Kerstin S. Haring United States	11	347 1.1×	107 0.4×	191 1.6×	20 0.2×	30 0.4×	30	499
Gabriella M. Hancock United States	11	259 0.8×	129 0.5×	44 0.4×	13 0.1×	85 1.2×	39	486
Richard Breton Canada	8	104 0.3×	142 0.6×	79 0.6×	22 0.2×	83 1.2×	16	410
Lawrence G. Shattuck United States	13	178 0.6×	52 0.2×	45 0.4×	28 0.3×	145 2.0×	40	500
Kevin Leach United States	14	68 0.2×	133 0.5×	272 2.2×	16 0.2×	59 0.8×	52	668
Nicholas L. Cassimatis United States	11	208 0.6×	105 0.4×	234 1.9×	10 0.1×	34 0.5×	25	610
Michael J. Schoelles United States	12	213 0.7×	209 0.9×	171 1.4×	9 0.1×	114 1.6×	46	637

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shafto

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shafto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shafto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shafto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shafto

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shafto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shafto. The network helps show where Michael Shafto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Shafto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Shafto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Shafto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Shafto. Michael Shafto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Clancey, William J., et al.. (2014). Work Practice Simulation of Complex Human-Automation Systems: The Brahms Generalized Überlingen Model. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1 indexed citations

Clancey, William J., et al.. (2013). Work Practice Simulation of Complex Human-Automation Systems in Safety Critical Situations: The Brahms Generalized berlingen Model. 1 indexed citations

Heymann, Michaël, Asaf Degani, & Michael Shafto. (2013). Modeling and Formal Analysis of Human-Machine Interaction. Oxford University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Rungta, Neha, Guillaume Brat, William J. Clancey, et al.. (2013). Aviation safety. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 27–37. 8 indexed citations

Sierhuis, Maarten, et al.. (2009). NASA's OCA Mirroring System: An Application of Multiagent Systems in Mission Control. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 85–92. 9 indexed citations

Freed, Michael, Robert N. Harris, & Michael Shafto. (2004). Comparing methods for UAV-based autonomous surveillance. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 5 indexed citations

Pell, Barney & Michael Shafto. (2004). Adjustable Autonomy in NASA's Exploration Vision. 3 indexed citations

Johnston, James C., et al.. (2002). Dual-Task Interference When A Response is Not Required. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 5 indexed citations

Seymour, Travis L., et al.. (2000). Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85(1). 30–37. 151 indexed citations

10.

Degani, Asaf, Michaël Heymann, & Michael Shafto. (1998). Some Formal Aspects of Human-Machine Interaction. 118. 115–27. 2 indexed citations

11.

Greeno, James G., William J. Clancey, Clayton Lewis, et al.. (1998). Efforts to Encourage Multidisciplinarity in the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science. 22(1). 131–132. 4 indexed citations

12.

Shafto, Michael, Asaf Degani, & Alex Kirlik. (1997). Canonical Correlation Analysis of Data on Human-Automation Interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 41(1). 62–65. 6 indexed citations

13.

Seifert, Colleen M., et al.. (1996). Can a Usable Product Flash 12:00? Perceived Usability is a Function of Usefulness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 40(5). 313–317. 2 indexed citations

14.

Degani, Asaf, et al.. (1996). MODES IN AUTOMATED COCKPITS: PROBLEMS, DATA ANALYSIS, AND A MODELING FRAMEWORK. 9 indexed citations

15.

Corker, Kevin, et al.. (1994). Models of Human Information Requirements: "When Reasonable Aiding Systems Disagree". NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 2 indexed citations

16.

Hawkins, Harold L., et al.. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics. 44(5). 484–492. 92 indexed citations

17.

Martin, Richard M., et al.. (1977). The reliability, validity, and design of the Defining Issues Test.. Developmental Psychology. 13(5). 460–468. 4 indexed citations

18.

Shafto, Michael, et al.. (1975). Judging creativity: A method for assessing how and by what criteria it is done.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 67(4). 478–483. 7 indexed citations

19.

Shafto, Michael. (1974). CLIQUE: A FORTRAN IV program for the Needham-Moody-Hollis cluster-listing algorithm. Behavior Research Methods. 6(1). 58–59. 2 indexed citations

20.

Shafto, Michael, et al.. (1973). Release from proactive interference with young children.. Developmental Psychology. 8(3). 396–396. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact