Michael Schlüter
-
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 78
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes 65
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments 44
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies 42
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 34
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 18
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 18
- Internal Medicine top 2%
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 19
- Co-authors
- Karl‐Heinz KückJoachim SchoferÉrick SchampaertAnthony GershlickThilo TüblerWilliam WijnsKlaus-Peter KunzeEulogio García
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Michael Schlüter
168 papers receiving 7.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 5.5k
- Surgery 3.2k
- Internal Medicine 231
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.8k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schlüter
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schlüter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schlüter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schlüter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schlüter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schlüter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schlüter. The network helps show where Michael Schlüter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schlüter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 3 | [Mitral valve interventions: Where do we stand?]. | 2015 | 0 |
| 4 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 211 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 373 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 430 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 105 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 16 | Catheter ablation of manifest accessory pathways related to the coronary sinus | 1993 | 1 |
| 17 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 58 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 30 |
About Michael Schlüter
Michael Schlüter is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 178 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (78 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (65 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (44 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (42 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (34 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (19 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (18 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (5.5k citations), Surgery (3.2k citations) and Internal Medicine (231 citations). Michael Schlüter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Karl‐Heinz Kück, Joachim Schofer, Érick Schampaert, Anthony Gershlick, Thilo Tübler, William Wijns, Klaus-Peter Kunze, Eulogio García, Günter Breithardt and Joachim Schöfer. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.