Michael S. Lee
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Cheng‐Han ChenRaymond ZimmerGaurav BankaRichard ShlofmitzJonathan M. TobisRaj MakkarGregg W. StoneAjay J. Kirtane
- Topics
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (16 papers)Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (12 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael S. Lee
62 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Surgery 748
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 400
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 332
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 263
- Biomedical Engineering 148
Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Lee. The network helps show where Michael S. Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael S. Lee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael S. Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael S. Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael S. Lee. Michael S. Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | Adoption of Routine Ultrasound Guidance for Femoral Arterial Access for Cardiac Catheterization. | 20 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 64 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Michael S. Lee
Michael S. Lee is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Ophthalmology and Surgery, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (16 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (12 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (400 citations), Surgery (748 citations) and Transplantation (42 citations). Michael S. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Han Chen, Raymond Zimmer, Gaurav Banka, Richard Shlofmitz, Jonathan M. Tobis, Raj Makkar, Gregg W. Stone, Ajay J. Kirtane, Jared Oyama and Gregg W. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.