Michael S. Conley

16 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers

Michael S. Conley
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 202
  • Rehabilitation 118
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 104
  • Pharmacology 142
  • Cell Biology 116
Replace Prem P. Gogia with:
Prem P. Gogia United States
Marie-Ève Isner-Horobeti France
O Serresse Canada
Islay M. McEwan United Kingdom
Klaus Klausen Denmark
Timothy J. Demchak United States
Alex Souto Maior Brazil
Michael Laymon United States
Pablo Herrero Spain
Humberto Miranda Brazil
Michael S. Conley relative to Prem P. Gogia United States Prem P. Gogia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Prem P. Gogia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Conley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Conley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Conley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Conley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Conley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Conley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Conley. The network helps show where Michael S. Conley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Conley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Conley Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Conley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1995170
2 1995108
3 199791
4 199769
5 199752
6 199650
7 199631
8
National Strength and Conditioning Association Position Statement: Health Aspects of Resistance Exercise and Training.
200116
9 199616
10 200116
11 19975
12 19943
13 19983
14 19983
15 19952
16 20011

About Michael S. Conley

Michael S. Conley is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology, Rehabilitation and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Sports Performance and Training (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Food Science and Nutritional Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (202 citations), Rehabilitation (118 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (104 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations) and Cell Biology (116 citations). Michael S. Conley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael H. Stone, Ronald A. Meyer, Gary A. Dudley, Daniel L. Feeback, Jacob J. Bloomberg, James B. Kramer, Ralph Rozenek, D. A. Henson, D.C. Nieman and Diane E. Butterworth. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Strength and conditioning journal, Journal of Applied Physiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact