Michael Oswald

687 citations
65 papers · 408 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Oswald

55 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Michael Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Developmental Biology 63
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 73
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 33
  • General Dentistry 7
  • Aerospace Engineering 91
Replace René Fléron with:
René Fléron Denmark
Charles B. King United States
Larry L. Pater United States
Richard E. Harness United States
James Campbell Netherlands
Hideaki Nishizawa Japan
Pete E. Lestrel United States
Thomas Griffiths Austria
Casey L. Brown United States
Aya Sato Japan
Michael Oswald relative to René Fléron Denmark René Fléron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
René Fléron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Oswald. The network helps show where Michael Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Michael Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 200837
3 201633
4 197623
5 199720
6 202119
7 197717
8 200812
9 198012
10 200512
11 202111
12
SENSITIVITY OF THE SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT TO LARGE CONSTELLATIONS AND SMALL SATELLITES
201710
13 202210
14 200410
15 20229
16
[Vaporization of urethral stenosis using the KTP 532 laser].
19979
17 20069
18 20048
19 20207
20 20197

About Michael Oswald

Michael Oswald is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Ecology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Satellite Systems and Control (21 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (13 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (12 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (9 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (7 papers), Space exploration and regulation (7 papers), Marine animal studies overview (6 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (63 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (73 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (33 citations), General Dentistry (7 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (91 citations). Michael Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Barrie D. Robison, J. Erwin, Carsten Wiedemann, Peter Vörsmann, H. Klinkrad, Julie N. Oswald, Shannon Rankin, James A. Martenson, Joan S. Lockard and David McKinney. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Space Research, Acta Astronautica, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Primates and American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact