Michael Nash

973 total citations
10 papers, 269 citations indexed

About

Michael Nash is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Nash has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 269 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Insect Science, 3 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Michael Nash's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers). Michael Nash is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers). Michael Nash collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Michael Nash's co-authors include Ary A. Hoffmann, Linda J. Thomson, Andrew R. Weeks, Paul A. Umina, Alessandro Ossola, Stephen J. Livesley, Amy K. Hahs, Gabriella Mangano, Ken Henry and David Sharley and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Applications, Ecosystems and Biological Control.

In The Last Decade

Michael Nash

9 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Nash Australia 7 189 113 111 56 25 10 269
Edmond R. Zaborski United States 10 183 1.0× 176 1.6× 113 1.0× 87 1.6× 16 0.6× 15 367
John Pote United States 9 178 0.9× 87 0.8× 186 1.7× 31 0.6× 11 0.4× 12 306
Christopher R. Philips United States 10 204 1.1× 153 1.4× 131 1.2× 62 1.1× 73 2.9× 17 347
Morgan W. Shields New Zealand 8 165 0.9× 144 1.3× 118 1.1× 46 0.8× 26 1.0× 19 294
Stephen D. Cockfield United States 13 281 1.5× 134 1.2× 143 1.3× 71 1.3× 24 1.0× 30 355
Melanie Hahn Germany 7 84 0.4× 124 1.1× 172 1.5× 45 0.8× 87 3.5× 9 287
Martin Longley United Kingdom 11 336 1.8× 274 2.4× 105 0.9× 47 0.8× 54 2.2× 15 451
Belén Cotes Spain 14 244 1.3× 149 1.3× 150 1.4× 49 0.9× 39 1.6× 15 341
Julia M. Schmack Germany 9 96 0.5× 85 0.8× 170 1.5× 57 1.0× 63 2.5× 15 268
Elena Krimmer Germany 8 190 1.0× 97 0.9× 181 1.6× 40 0.7× 92 3.7× 9 307

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Nash. The network helps show where Michael Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Nash. Michael Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
2.
Ossola, Alessandro, Amy K. Hahs, Michael Nash, & Stephen J. Livesley. (2016). Habitat Complexity Enhances Comminution and Decomposition Processes in Urban Ecosystems. Ecosystems. 19(5). 927–941. 38 indexed citations
3.
Norton, Briony A., Linda J. Thomson, & Michael Nash. (2015). Ophyiulus in Victoria: results of millipede surveys from south-eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 127(2). 69–80.
4.
Nash, Michael. (2013). Alien invertebrates are invading the Australian Alps. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 3 indexed citations
5.
Nash, Michael, Ary A. Hoffmann, & Linda J. Thomson. (2010). Identifying signature of chemical applications on indigenous and invasive nontarget arthropod communities in vineyards. Ecological Applications. 20(6). 1693–1703. 45 indexed citations
6.
Thomson, Linda J., et al.. (2010). Effect of woody vegetation at the landscape scale on the abundance of natural enemies in Australian vineyards. Biological Control. 54(3). 248–254. 32 indexed citations
7.
Nash, Michael, Linda J. Thomson, & Ary A. Hoffmann. (2008). Effect of remnant vegetation, pesticides, and farm management on abundance of the beneficial predator Notonomus gravis (Chaudoir) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biological Control. 46(2). 83–93. 37 indexed citations
8.
Hoffmann, Ary A., Andrew R. Weeks, Michael Nash, Gabriella Mangano, & Paul A. Umina. (2008). The changing status of invertebrate pests and the future of pest management in the Australian grains industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 48(12). 1481–1481. 47 indexed citations
9.
Hoffmann, Ary A., et al.. (2008). Pests of germinating grain crops in southern Australia: an overview of their biology and management options. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 48(12). 1560–1560. 33 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Graham, et al.. (1992). Short papers in pharmaceutical analysis. Analytical Proceedings. 29(5). 171–171. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026