Michael M. Sokal
- General Psychology top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Raymond E. FancherRichard GillespieRobert C. FullerAudrey B. DavisNorman GarmezyWilliam J. McGuireFrank KesselJohn C. Burnham
- Topics
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (36 papers)Social Representations and Identity (4 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael M. Sokal
36 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- General Psychology 295
- Social Psychology 119
- Clinical Psychology 94
- History and Philosophy of Science 77
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Sokal
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Sokal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Sokal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Sokal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Sokal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Sokal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Sokal. The network helps show where Michael M. Sokal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael M. Sokal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael M. Sokal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael M. Sokal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael M. Sokal. Michael M. Sokal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | The origins of the new psychology in the United States. | 5 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Psychology, Science, And Human Affairs: Essays In Honor Of William Bevan | 13 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | Psychological testing and American society 1890-1930. | 48 |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | History of psychology and history of science: reflections on two subdisciplines, their relationship, and their convergence. | 6 |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Michael M. Sokal
Michael M. Sokal is a scholar working on General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (36 papers), Social Representations and Identity (4 papers) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (295 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (77 citations) and Social Psychology (119 citations). Michael M. Sokal has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Raymond E. Fancher, Richard Gillespie, Robert C. Fuller, Audrey B. Davis, Norman Garmezy, William J. McGuire, Frank Kessel, John C. Burnham, Richard Trumbull and Henry D. Shapiro. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Psychologist and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.