Michael Love

599 total citations
20 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Michael Love is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Love has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 4 papers in Computational Mechanics and 4 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Michael Love's work include Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control (10 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (9 papers) and Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (4 papers). Michael Love is often cited by papers focused on Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control (10 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (9 papers) and Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (4 papers). Michael Love collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Michael Love's co-authors include Paul Scott Zink, Chaoqun Liu, Hua Shan, Li Jiang, Robert C. Scott, Terrence A. Weisshaar, Peter Flick, Dimitri N. Mavris, David P. White and Mordechay Karpel and has published in prestigious journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Computers & Fluids and 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.

In The Last Decade

Michael Love

20 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Love United States 10 392 211 90 60 59 20 484
Paul Scott Zink United States 13 321 0.8× 129 0.6× 82 0.9× 65 1.1× 64 1.1× 25 405
Gerald D. Miller United States 6 415 1.1× 213 1.0× 126 1.4× 79 1.3× 97 1.6× 9 505
Peter Flick United States 14 501 1.3× 196 0.9× 153 1.7× 59 1.0× 121 2.1× 26 605
Edmund Pendleton United States 6 322 0.8× 133 0.6× 126 1.4× 76 1.3× 89 1.5× 12 423
Rudy Yurkovich United States 9 247 0.6× 184 0.9× 66 0.7× 45 0.8× 42 0.7× 18 342
Kari Appa United States 11 293 0.7× 174 0.8× 97 1.1× 89 1.5× 49 0.8× 35 433
Luca Cavagna Italy 12 299 0.8× 219 1.0× 52 0.6× 60 1.0× 54 0.9× 30 403
Kenneth Griffin United States 7 288 0.7× 128 0.6× 102 1.1× 64 1.1× 58 1.0× 12 353
Joon W. Lim United States 16 460 1.2× 342 1.6× 65 0.7× 92 1.5× 86 1.5× 49 606
Carol D. Wieseman United States 15 433 1.1× 340 1.6× 135 1.5× 72 1.2× 155 2.6× 48 625

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Love. The network helps show where Michael Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Love. Michael Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pendleton, Edmund, et al.. (2009). An Integrated Airframe Experiment for Future Responsive Access to Space Applications. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 5 indexed citations
2.
Love, Michael, et al.. (2009). Aeroservoelastic Analysis of a SensorCraft Vehicle and Comparison with Wind Tunnel Data. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 3 indexed citations
4.
Love, Michael, et al.. (2007). Demonstration of Morphing Technology through Ground and Wind Tunnel Tests. 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 61 indexed citations
5.
Shan, Hua, et al.. (2007). Numerical study of passive and active flow separation control over a NACA0012 airfoil. Computers & Fluids. 37(8). 975–992. 95 indexed citations
6.
Scott, Robert C., et al.. (2007). Validation of the Lockheed Martin Morphing Concept with Wind Tunnel Testing. 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 70 indexed citations
8.
Love, Michael, et al.. (2005). Body Freedom Flutter of High Aspect Ratio Flying Wings. 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 66 indexed citations
9.
Love, Michael, et al.. (2004). Drag Minimization Through the use of Mission Adaptive Trailing Edge Flaps and Fuel State Control. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. 9 indexed citations
10.
Love, Michael, et al.. (2004). Impact of Actuation Concepts on Morphing Aircraft Structures. 61 indexed citations
11.
Love, Michael. (2003). Identification of Critical Flight Loads. 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 5 indexed citations
12.
Darmofal, David, Earll M. Murman, & Michael Love. (2001). Re-engineering aerodynamics education. 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. 7 indexed citations
13.
Flick, Peter, Michael Love, & Paul Scott Zink. (2000). The Impact of Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology on Conceptual Aircraft Design. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 19 indexed citations
14.
Zink, Paul Scott, Dimitri N. Mavris, Peter Flick, & Michael Love. (1999). Impact of Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology on Wing Geometry Using Response Surface Methodology. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology). 13 indexed citations
15.
Zink, Paul Scott, Dimitri N. Mavris, Peter Flick, & Michael Love. (1999). Development of Wing Structural Weight Equation for Active Aeroelastic Wing Technology. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 8 indexed citations
16.
Zink, Paul Scott, Dimitri N. Mavris, Michael Love, & Mordechay Karpel. (1998). Robust design for aeroelastically tailored/active aeroelastic wing. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 20 indexed citations
17.
Karpel, Mordechay, Boris Moulin, & Michael Love. (1998). Structural optimization with stress and aeroelastic constraints using expandable modal basis. 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit. 5 indexed citations
18.
Love, Michael. (1998). Multidisciplinary design practices from the F-16 Agile Falcon. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 7 indexed citations
19.
Bohlmann, Jonathan D., et al.. (1992). Application of analytical and design tools for fighter wing aeroelastic tailoring. 33rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 5 indexed citations
20.
Love, Michael & Jonathan D. Bohlmann. (1991). Aeroelastic tailoring in vehicle design synthesis. 32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026