Michael Levine

859 citations
26 papers · 384 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Levine

25 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Michael Levine
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Statistics and Probability 137
  • Computational Mathematics 4
  • Small Animals 39
  • Parasitology 34
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
Replace D. Romero with:
D. Romero Spain
J. D. F. Habbema Netherlands
Júlia Singer Hungary
Yanlin Tang China
Van Zyl South Africa
Zhuoqiong He United States
Aliou Diop Senegal
J. v. Braun United States
Joshua P. French United States
Tamer Oraby United States
Michael Levine relative to D. Romero Spain D. Romero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
D. Romero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Levine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Levine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Levine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Levine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Levine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Levine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Levine. The network helps show where Michael Levine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Levine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Levine Line = papers co-authored together Michael Levine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200780
2 201241
3 201137
4 199133
5 200829
6 201427
7 200523
8 201321
9 201915
10 201614
11 200911
12 20079
13 20099
14 20067
15 20166
16 20165
17 20214
18 20123
19 20132
20 20182

About Michael Levine

Michael Levine is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Small Animals and Finance, having authored 26 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (13 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (6 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (3 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (2 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (137 citations), Computational Mathematics (4 citations), Small Animals (39 citations), Parasitology (34 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations). Michael Levine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence D. Brown, George E. Moore, David R. Hunter, Didier Chauveau, Moon Her, Lie Wang, Hu Suk Lee, Tommaso Cai, Mary E. Swigar and Boris M. Astrachan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Electronic Journal of Statistics, Bernoulli and Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact