Michael Legge
- Molecular Biology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lynnette M. JonesAilsa GouldingMartin H. SellensDebra L. WatersRuth FitzgeraldKim Meredith‐JonesMichael J. DentonJ P Stapleton
- Topics
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers)Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Legge
96 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Molecular Biology 315
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 269
- Physiology 200
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 186
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 157
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Legge
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Legge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Legge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Legge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Legge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Legge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Legge. The network helps show where Michael Legge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Legge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Legge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Legge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Legge. Michael Legge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 132 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 103 | |
| 20 | The clinical significance of low urine oestriol values. | 2 |
About Michael Legge
Michael Legge is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (157 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (148 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (99 citations). Michael Legge has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lynnette M. Jones, Ailsa Goulding, Martin H. Sellens, Debra L. Waters, Ruth Fitzgerald, Kim Meredith‐Jones, Michael J. Denton, J P Stapleton, Andrew Grey and M C Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.