Michael J. Sredl
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- James P. CollinsAnna E. SavageKelly R. ZamudioPhilip C. RosenT. Rupert JonesJoyce E. LongcoreGregory A. BradleyKim E. Zerba
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (20 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceMexico
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Sredl
19 papers receiving 508 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Global and Planetary Change 469
- Ecological Modeling 239
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 205
- Ecology 183
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 158
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Sredl
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Sredl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Sredl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Sredl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Sredl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Sredl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Sredl. The network helps show where Michael J. Sredl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Sredl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Sredl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Sredl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Sredl. Michael J. Sredl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | IUCN guidelines for amphibian reintroductions and other conservation translocations : first edition | 3 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 95 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | Chiricahua Leopard Frog Status in the Galiuro Mountains, Arizona, With a Monitoring Framework for the Species' Entire Range | 1 |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 160 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Effects of Microhabitat Destruction on Reptile Abundance in Sonoran Desert Rock Outcrops | 1 |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Michael J. Sredl
Michael J. Sredl is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (20 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (239 citations), Global and Planetary Change (469 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (205 citations). Michael J. Sredl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include James P. Collins, Anna E. Savage, Kelly R. Zamudio, Philip C. Rosen, T. Rupert Jones, Joyce E. Longcore, Gregory A. Bradley, Kim E. Zerba, Martin A. Schlaepfer and Steven M. Whitfield. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Conservation Biology and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.