Michael J. Pianta

1.2k total citations
33 papers, 964 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Pianta is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Pianta has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 964 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Pianta's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Michael J. Pianta is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Michael J. Pianta collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Michael J. Pianta's co-authors include Algis J. Vingrys, Michael Kalloniatis, Laura E. Downie, Erica L. Fletcher, Jennifer L. Wilkinson‐Berka, Genevieve Napper, Barbara Gillam, Allison M. McKendrick, Tomás S. Alemán and Samuel G. Jacobson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Physiology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Pianta

33 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Michael J. Pianta
Alvin Eisner United States
J. Jason McAnany United States
A Tormene Italy
Jason C. Park United States
Timothy W. Kraft United States
Beatrix Feigl Australia
Michael J. Pianta
Citations per year, relative to Michael J. Pianta Michael J. Pianta (= 1×) peers Torsten Straßer

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Pianta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Pianta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Pianta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Pianta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Pianta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Pianta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Pianta. The network helps show where Michael J. Pianta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Pianta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Pianta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Pianta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Pianta. Michael J. Pianta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pianta, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 104. 8–14. 12 indexed citations
2.
Pianta, Michael J., et al.. (2017). Spatio-temporal patterns of event-related potentials related to audiovisual synchrony judgments in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging. 55. 38–48. 14 indexed citations
3.
Pianta, Michael J., et al.. (2014). Older age results in difficulties separating auditory and visual signals in time. Journal of Vision. 14(11). 13–13. 40 indexed citations
4.
Pianta, Michael J., et al.. (2014). Reduced audiovisual recalibration in the elderly. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 6. 226–226. 24 indexed citations
5.
Ruseckaite, Rasa, et al.. (2011). Human scotopic dark adaptation: Comparison of recoveries of psychophysical threshold and ERG b-wave sensitivity. Journal of Vision. 11(8). 2–2. 16 indexed citations
6.
Abbott, Carla J., Ulrike Grünert, Michael J. Pianta, & Neville A. McBrien. (2010). Retinal thinning in tree shrews with induced high myopia: Optical coherence tomography and histological assessment. Vision Research. 51(3). 376–385. 33 indexed citations
7.
Fletcher, Erica L., Laura E. Downie, Kirstan A. Vessey, et al.. (2009). Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor Inhibition Is Neuroprotective to Amacrine Cells in a Rat Model of Retinopathy of Prematurity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3119–3119. 13 indexed citations
8.
Downie, Laura E., Michael J. Pianta, Algis J. Vingrys, et al.. (2009). Angiotensin type‐1 receptor inhibition is neuroprotective to amacrine cells in a rat model of retinopathy of prematurity. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 518(1). 41–63. 38 indexed citations
9.
Fletcher, Erica L., Laura E. Downie, Kirstan A. Vessey, et al.. (2009). The significance of neuronal and glial cell changes in the rat retina during oxygen-induced retinopathy. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 120(1). 67–86. 52 indexed citations
10.
Verma, Richa & Michael J. Pianta. (2009). The contribution of human cone photoreceptorsto the photopic flicker electroretinogram. Journal of Vision. 9(3). 9–9. 11 indexed citations
11.
Downie, Laura E., Michael J. Pianta, Algis J. Vingrys, Jennifer L. Wilkinson‐Berka, & Erica L. Fletcher. (2008). AT1receptor inhibition prevents astrocyte degeneration and restores vascular growth in oxygen‐induced retinopathy. Glia. 56(10). 1076–1090. 76 indexed citations
12.
Downie, Laura E., Michael J. Pianta, Algis J. Vingrys, Jennifer L. Wilkinson‐Berka, & Erica L. Fletcher. (2007). Neuronal and glial cell changes are determined by retinal vascularization in retinopathy of prematurity. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 504(4). 404–417. 56 indexed citations
13.
Gillam, Barbara & Michael J. Pianta. (2005). The effect of surface placement and surface overlap on stereo slant contrast and enhancement. Vision Research. 45(25-26). 3083–3095. 9 indexed citations
14.
Pianta, Michael J., Tomás S. Alemán, Artur V. Cideciyan, et al.. (2003). In vivo micropathology of Best macular dystrophy with optical coherence tomography. Experimental Eye Research. 76(2). 203–211. 51 indexed citations
15.
Pianta, Michael J. & Barbara Gillam. (2003). Monocular gap stereopsis: manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap. Vision Research. 43(18). 1937–1950. 22 indexed citations
16.
Pianta, Michael J. & Barbara Gillam. (2002). Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception. Vision Research. 43(1). 1–6. 25 indexed citations
17.
Napper, Genevieve, Michael J. Pianta, & Michael Kalloniatis. (2001). Localization of amino acid neurotransmitters following in vitro ischemia and anoxia in the rat retina. Visual Neuroscience. 18(3). 413–427. 34 indexed citations
18.
Gillam, Barbara, Shane Blackburn, & Michael J. Pianta. (2000). The reasons for anisotropy in stereoscopic slant contrast. Perception. 29. 0–0. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pianta, Michael J. & Michael Kalloniatis. (2000). Characterisation of dark adaptation in human cone pathways: an application of the equivalent background hypothesis. The Journal of Physiology. 528(3). 591–608. 25 indexed citations
20.
Kalloniatis, Michael & Michael J. Pianta. (1997). L and M Cone Input into Spectral Sensitivity Functions: A Reanalysis. Vision Research. 37(6). 799–811. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026