Michael J. Kikta
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- D. Preston FlaniganJoseph P. MeyerJames J. SchulerRashad A. BisharaThomas H. SchwarczJens Eldrup‐JorgensenJoseph R. DurhamDonald Silver
- Topics
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers)Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers)Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vascular SurgeryArchives of SurgeryPubMed
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Kikta
9 papers receiving 395 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Surgery 303
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 165
- Internal Medicine 124
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 91
- Rehabilitation 75
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Kikta
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Kikta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Kikta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Kikta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Kikta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Kikta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Kikta. The network helps show where Michael J. Kikta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Kikta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Kikta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Kikta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Kikta. Michael J. Kikta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Can low molecular weight heparins and heparinoids be safely given to patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome? | 56 |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boots versus hydroactive dressing in the treatment of venous stasis ulcers. | 84 |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 85 |
About Michael J. Kikta
Michael J. Kikta is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Internal Medicine and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (124 citations), Occupational Therapy (50 citations) and Rehabilitation (75 citations). Michael J. Kikta has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Preston Flanigan, Joseph P. Meyer, James J. Schuler, Rashad A. Bishara, Thomas H. Schwarcz, Jens Eldrup‐Jorgensen, Joseph R. Durham, Donald Silver and J J Schuler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Archives of Surgery and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.