Michael J. Field

1.9k total citations
38 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Field is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nephrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Field has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Molecular Biology, 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Nephrology. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Field's work include Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (10 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers). Michael J. Field is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (10 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers). Michael J. Field collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Michael J. Field's co-authors include Carol A. Pollock, Jill Gordon, Emily Hibbert, Harold P. Lehmann, Jeremy Ward, J. R. Lawrence, Patricia M. Lyon, Les Barnsley, Ilona Cunningham and David W. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Physiology and Kidney International.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Field

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Field Australia 16 474 225 180 163 152 38 1.2k
Allan D. Cumming United Kingdom 18 407 0.9× 158 0.7× 81 0.5× 245 1.5× 101 0.7× 50 1.2k
Arnold R. Eiser United States 19 284 0.6× 473 2.1× 51 0.3× 88 0.5× 97 0.6× 56 1.4k
Warwick Bagg New Zealand 18 251 0.5× 152 0.7× 126 0.7× 115 0.7× 103 0.7× 69 1.2k
Margaret MacDougall United Kingdom 16 165 0.3× 89 0.4× 109 0.6× 45 0.3× 95 0.6× 56 879
Mogamat Razeen Davids South Africa 20 140 0.3× 139 0.6× 125 0.7× 104 0.6× 63 0.4× 88 1.1k
Marieke Spreeuwenberg Netherlands 21 179 0.4× 448 2.0× 59 0.3× 309 1.9× 89 0.6× 52 1.3k
Françoise G. Pradel United States 18 530 1.1× 157 0.7× 36 0.2× 57 0.3× 272 1.8× 30 1.2k
Joseph Stauffer United States 13 323 0.7× 70 0.3× 133 0.7× 171 1.0× 97 0.6× 27 1.1k
Tang Ching Lau Singapore 21 354 0.7× 364 1.6× 48 0.3× 351 2.2× 192 1.3× 51 1.5k
Helady Sanders‐Pinheiro Brazil 19 141 0.3× 67 0.3× 146 0.8× 75 0.5× 157 1.0× 73 950

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Field. The network helps show where Michael J. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Field. Michael J. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Field, Michael J.. (2018). A two-year progress report on medical education standards in the Western Pacific: Presidential address 2018. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 15. 6–6. 1 indexed citations
2.
Geffen, Laurie, et al.. (2014). Medical school accreditation in China: A Sino-Australian collaboration. Medical Teacher. 36(11). 973–977. 12 indexed citations
3.
Field, Michael J.. (2011). Medical school accreditation in Australia: Issues involved in assessing major changes and new programs. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 8. 6–6. 10 indexed citations
4.
Illing, Jan, Gill Morrow, Charlotte Kergon, et al.. (2008). How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice ? a comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Final report to GMC April 2008.. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 59 indexed citations
5.
Nisbet, Gillian, et al.. (2008). Interprofessional learning for pre-qualification health care students: An outcomes-based evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 22(1). 57–68. 83 indexed citations
6.
Becker, Gavin J., et al.. (2008). KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines on Hepatitis C in Chronic Kidney Disease acknowledged by ISN. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology. 4(12). 648–649. 10 indexed citations
7.
Barnsley, Les, et al.. (2004). Clinical skills in junior medical officers: a comparison of self‐reported confidence and observed competence. Medical Education. 38(4). 358–367. 265 indexed citations
8.
Ward, Jeremy, Jill Gordon, Michael J. Field, & Harold P. Lehmann. (2001). Communication and information technology in medical education. The Lancet. 357(9258). 792–796. 196 indexed citations
9.
Johnson, David W., Heather J. Saunders, David A. Vesey, et al.. (2000). Enalaprilat Directly Ameliorates in vitro Cyclosporin Nephrotoxicity in Human Tubulo-Interstitial Cells. ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals. 86(4). 473–481. 12 indexed citations
11.
Prideaux, David, et al.. (2000). The Consortium of Graduate Medical Schools in Australia: formal and informal collaboration in medical education. Medical Education. 34(6). 449–454. 27 indexed citations
12.
Johnson, David W., Heather J. Saunders, Bronwyn K. Brew, et al.. (1998). TGF-β1 dissociates human proximal tubule cell growth and Na+-H+ exchange activity. Kidney International. 53(6). 1601–1607. 17 indexed citations
13.
Field, Michael J. & Ann Jervie Sefton. (1998). Computer‐based management of content in planning a problem‐based medical curriculum. Medical Education. 32(2). 163–171. 10 indexed citations
14.
Johnson, David W., Bronwyn K. Brew, Philip Poronnik, et al.. (1997). Transport characteristics of human proximal tubule cells in primary culture. Nephrology. 3(2). 183–194. 30 indexed citations
15.
Pollock, Carol A., et al.. (1995). Modulators of growth in primary culture of rat proximal tubular cells. Nephrology. 1(1). 65–72. 7 indexed citations
16.
Pollock, Carol A., Roger Wyndham, Grahame J. Elder, et al.. (1994). Effects of erythropoietin therapy on the lipid profile in end-stage renal failure. Kidney International. 45(3). 897–902. 33 indexed citations
17.
Reddy, Srijaya K., et al.. (1994). EFFECT OF ATRIAL NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE ON CELLULAR ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS IN RAT PROXIMAL TUBULES: EVIDENCE FOR INHIBITION OF THE SODIUM PUMP. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. 21(10). 775–780. 3 indexed citations
18.
Pollock, Carol A., et al.. (1992). Tubular sodium handling and tubuloglomerular feedback in compensatory renal hypertrophy. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 420(2). 159–166. 27 indexed citations
19.
Bostrom, Thor, Michael J. Field, Á. Z. Györy, Marlen Dyne, & D. J. H. Cockayne. (1991). Electron probe X‐ray microanalysis of intracellular element concentrations in cryosections in the presence of changes in cell volume. Journal of Microscopy. 162(3). 319–333. 2 indexed citations
20.
Field, Michael J., et al.. (1989). Acute cisplatin nephrotoxicity in the rat. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology. 414(6). 647–650. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026