Michael J. Ensley

749 total citations
23 papers, 416 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Ensley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Ensley has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 416 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in Strategy and Management and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Ensley's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (18 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers). Michael J. Ensley is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (18 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers). Michael J. Ensley collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Norway. Michael J. Ensley's co-authors include Edward G. Carmines, Michael W. Wagner, Ryan L. Claassen, Scott de Marchi, Scott Basinger, Sidharth Kumar Sethi, Vinod Krishnappa, Rupesh Raina, Akash Deep and Timothy E. Bunchman and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Political Science and Public Opinion Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Ensley

23 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Michael J. Ensley

PSIR

SPS

COMMU

SM

GS

Candice J. Nelson South Africa

Jeffrey D. Grynaviski United States

Christopher Skovron United States

Jacob R. Neiheisel United States

Daniel R. Biggers United States

Cameron D. Anderson Canada

Daniel C. Bowen United States

Brandon Rottinghaus United States

Logan Dancey United States

Tom Louwerse Netherlands

Candice J. Nelson South Africa

Michael J. Ensley

179 ×0.7

PSIR

86 ×0.5

SPS

102 ×1.0

COMMU

50 ×0.5

SM

37 ×0.6

GS

Citations per year, relative to Michael J. Ensley Michael J. Ensley (= 1×) peers Candice J. Nelson

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Ensley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Ensley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Ensley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Ensley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Ensley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Ensley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Ensley. The network helps show where Michael J. Ensley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Ensley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Ensley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Ensley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Ensley. Michael J. Ensley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Claassen, Ryan L., Michael J. Ensley, & John Barry Ryan. (2024). Do Fans Make Poor Referees? Exploring Citizens’ Reactions to Partisan Gamesmanship. Political Behavior. 47(3). 1295–1315. 1 indexed citations

2.

Marchi, Scott de, et al.. (2020). Policy and the structure of roll call voting in the US house. Journal of Public Policy. 41(2). 384–408. 4 indexed citations

3.

Hancock, Landon E., et al.. (2019). Selling the Iran Nuclear Agreement: Prospect Theory and the Campaign to Frame the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. Congress & the Presidency. 46(3). 417–445. 2 indexed citations

4.

Raina, Rupesh, Timothy E. Bunchman, David J. Askenazi, et al.. (2017). Treatment of AKI in developing and developed countries: An international survey of pediatric dialysis modalities. PLoS ONE. 12(5). e0178233–e0178233. 40 indexed citations

5.

Krishnappa, Vinod, Mohit Gupta, Michael J. Ensley, et al.. (2017). Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Meta‐Analysis of Case Reports Confirms the Prevalence of Genetic Mutations and the Shift of Treatment Regimens. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis. 22(2). 178–188. 19 indexed citations

6.

Claassen, Ryan L. & Michael J. Ensley. (2017). Mine is a likable rogue, yours is a degenerate criminal. When it comes to 'dirty campaign tricks' partisans tend to ignore bad news about their own.. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

7.

Carmines, Edward G., Michael J. Ensley, & Michael W. Wagner. (2016). Ideological Heterogeneity and the Rise of Donald Trump. The Forum. 14(4). 385–397. 12 indexed citations

8.

Claassen, Ryan L. & Michael J. Ensley. (2015). Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans: Mine is a Likable Rogue, Yours is a Degenerate Criminal. Political Behavior. 38(2). 317–335. 58 indexed citations

9.

Evans, Heather K., Michael J. Ensley, & Edward G. Carmines. (2014). The Enduring Effects of Competitive Elections. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 24(4). 455–472. 7 indexed citations

10.

Carmines, Edward G., Michael J. Ensley, & Michael W. Wagner. (2012). Political Ideology in American Politics: One, Two, or None?. The Forum. 10(3). 32 indexed citations

11.

Carmines, Edward G., Michael J. Ensley, & Michael W. Wagner. (2012). Who Fits the Left-Right Divide? Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate. American Behavioral Scientist. 56(12). 1631–1653. 63 indexed citations

12.

Basinger, Scott, Damon M. Cann, & Michael J. Ensley. (2010). Voter response to congressional campaigns: new techniques for analyzing aggregate electoral behavior. Public Choice. 150(3-4). 771–792. 8 indexed citations

13.

Bucy, Erik P. & Michael J. Ensley. (2009). Issue Benefactors or Issue Victims? Ballot Initiative Influence on the Vote for California Governor, 1982-1998. California Journal of Politics and Policy. 1(2). 1 indexed citations

14.

Ensley, Michael J., et al.. (2009). District Complexity as an Advantage in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science. 53(4). 990–1005. 28 indexed citations

15.

Bucy, Erik P. & Michael J. Ensley. (2009). Issue Benefactors or Issue Victims? Ballot Initiative Influence on the Vote for California Governor, 1982-1998. California Journal of Politics and Policy. 1(2). 1–32. 3 indexed citations

16.

Ensley, Michael J. & Erik P. Bucy. (2009). Do Candidate Positions Matter?. American Politics Research. 38(1). 142–164. 4 indexed citations

17.

Ensley, Michael J.. (2008). Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology. Public Choice. 138(1-2). 221–238. 70 indexed citations

18.

Ensley, Michael J., Scott de Marchi, & Michael C. Munger. (2007). Candidate uncertainty, mental models, and complexity: Some experimental results. Public Choice. 132(1-2). 231–246. 7 indexed citations

19.

Basinger, Scott & Michael J. Ensley. (2007). Candidates, Campaigns, or Partisan Conditions? Reevaluating Strategic‐Politicians Theory. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 32(3). 361–394. 15 indexed citations

20.

Bowers, Jake, Nancy Burns, Michael J. Ensley, & Donald R. Kinder. (2004). Analyzing the 2000 National Election Study. Political Analysis. 13(1). 109–111. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact