Michael J. Crowe

3.2k total citations
84 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Crowe is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Crowe has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 15 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 14 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Crowe's work include History and Developments in Astronomy (11 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (10 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers). Michael J. Crowe is often cited by papers focused on History and Developments in Astronomy (11 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (10 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers). Michael J. Crowe collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Michael J. Crowe's co-authors include Lorraine Sheppard, Alistair Campbell, Susan Golombok, John Rust, Ian Bennun, Craig Fraser, Anne Jones, Susan Gordon, Rebecca Sealey and Patricia Gillan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Today and Developmental Cell.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Crowe

77 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Crowe United States 21 606 316 283 276 245 84 2.0k
Caroline Brett United Kingdom 23 358 0.6× 239 0.8× 309 1.1× 195 0.7× 217 0.9× 69 2.1k
Julie Horrocks Canada 27 545 0.9× 187 0.6× 426 1.5× 212 0.8× 264 1.1× 54 1.7k
Michael Berger Germany 16 625 1.0× 131 0.4× 188 0.7× 240 0.9× 131 0.5× 77 1.6k
Stephen J. Finch United States 30 688 1.1× 159 0.5× 321 1.1× 439 1.6× 213 0.9× 137 4.0k
Paul Morrison Australia 28 700 1.2× 282 0.9× 409 1.4× 812 2.9× 333 1.4× 170 2.6k
Valerie Williams United States 23 516 0.9× 360 1.1× 275 1.0× 421 1.5× 227 0.9× 89 2.9k
Noriko Cable United Kingdom 26 380 0.6× 201 0.6× 134 0.5× 526 1.9× 255 1.0× 68 2.2k
Tom Loeys Belgium 29 642 1.1× 554 1.8× 272 1.0× 247 0.9× 338 1.4× 135 2.9k
Esperanza Navarro‐Pardo Spain 23 427 0.7× 269 0.9× 271 1.0× 187 0.7× 107 0.4× 106 1.6k
Nancy Briggs Australia 24 461 0.8× 341 1.1× 109 0.4× 205 0.7× 232 0.9× 120 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Crowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Crowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Crowe. The network helps show where Michael J. Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Crowe. Michael J. Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (2025). Assessment of Management Competency Among Senior Hospital Managers in Nepalese Public Hospitals: A cross-sectional study. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management. 20(3).
2.
Jones, Anne, et al.. (2022). Extended Scope Physiotherapists are Effective and Safe in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice.
3.
Crowe, Michael J. & Lorraine Sheppard. (2021). Scoping review of health outcomes for people with disabilities in user-led organisations. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 27(5). 339–349. 2 indexed citations
4.
Leikina, Evgenia, Dilani G. Gamage, Vikram Prasad, et al.. (2018). Myomaker and Myomerger Work Independently to Control Distinct Steps of Membrane Remodeling during Myoblast Fusion. Developmental Cell. 46(6). 767–780.e7. 116 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Anne, Rebecca Sealey, Michael J. Crowe, & Susan Gordon. (2014). Concurrent validity and reliability of the Simple Goniometer iPhone app compared with the Universal Goniometer. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 30(7). 512–516. 72 indexed citations
6.
Crowe, Michael J. & Lorraine Sheppard. (2011). A general critical appraisal tool: An evaluation of construct validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 48(12). 1505–1516. 143 indexed citations
7.
Crowe, Michael J., Lorraine Sheppard, & Alistair Campbell. (2011). Reliability analysis for a proposed critical appraisal tool demonstrated value for diverse research designs. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 65(4). 375–383. 143 indexed citations
8.
Crowe, Michael J., Lorraine Sheppard, & Alistair Campbell. (2011). Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 9(4). 444–449. 120 indexed citations
9.
Crowe, Michael J. & Lorraine Sheppard. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative research designs are more similar than different. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 8(4). 5. 5 indexed citations
10.
Crowe, Michael J. & Lorraine Sheppard. (2010). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 64(1). 79–89. 208 indexed citations
11.
Crowe, Michael J.. (2008). The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, Antiquity to 1915: A Source Book. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 13 indexed citations
12.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (1999). Archaeoastronomy and the History of Science. 14(1). 22. 1 indexed citations
13.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (1998). A calendar of the correspondence of Sir John Herschel. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations
14.
Crowe, Michael J.. (1994). Modern theories of the universe : from Herschel to Hubble. Dover Publications eBooks. 13 indexed citations
15.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (1993). PSORIASIS CONTRALATERAL TO HEMIPARESIS FOLLOWING CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT. International Journal of Dermatology. 32(8). 598–599. 10 indexed citations
16.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (1992). Photoallergic and Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Butyl-methoxydibenzoylmethane. Dermatitis. 3(1). 33–34. 8 indexed citations
17.
Crowe, Michael J.. (1981). New Light on the Moon Hoax. S&T. 62. 428. 1 indexed citations
18.
Crowe, Michael J., et al.. (1978). Depression: Avoidance learning and physiological correlates in clinical and analog populations. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 16(1). 21–31. 10 indexed citations
19.
Crowe, Michael J.. (1976). Bibliography of the writings of Carl B. Boyer. Historia Mathematica. 3(4). 397–401. 1 indexed citations
20.
Crowe, Michael J.. (1975). Ten “Laws” concerning patterns of change in the history of mathematics. Historia Mathematica. 2(2). 161–166. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026