Michael G. Bourke
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Trevor RussellKay M. CrossleyMark D. NelsonPhilip A. DaltonDeclan M. SodenPatrick F. FordeSylwester SalwaPeter Buttrum
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (11 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers)Microbial Inactivation Methods (5 papers)
- Cited by
- BiotechnologyRehabilitationSurgery
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryCancer Treatment Reviews
- Partner nations
- AustraliaIrelandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael G. Bourke
19 papers receiving 488 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Surgery 211
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 96
- Biotechnology 95
- Epidemiology 62
- Rehabilitation 60
Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Bourke
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Bourke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Bourke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Bourke. The network helps show where Michael G. Bourke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael G. Bourke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael G. Bourke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael G. Bourke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael G. Bourke. Michael G. Bourke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 75 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | Comparing Outcomes of Medial Parapatellar and Subvastus Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial | 5 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 23 |
About Michael G. Bourke
Michael G. Bourke is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Rehabilitation and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (11 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (95 citations), Rehabilitation (60 citations) and Surgery (211 citations). Michael G. Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Trevor Russell, Kay M. Crossley, Mark D. Nelson, Philip A. Dalton, Declan M. Soden, Patrick F. Forde, Sylwester Salwa, Peter Buttrum, Gwendolen Jull and Steven McPhail. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery and Cancer Treatment Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.