Michael Foster Green
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joseph VenturaAndrew ShanerRobert Paul LibermanKeith H. NuechterleinBruno G. BreitmeyerPaul SatzMarcel KinsbournePatrick W. Corrigan
- Topics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Foster Green
12 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Psychiatry and Mental health 756
- Cognitive Neuroscience 485
- Clinical Psychology 361
- Philosophy 230
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Foster Green
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Foster Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Foster Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Foster Green more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Foster Green
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Foster Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Foster Green. The network helps show where Michael Foster Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Foster Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Foster Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Foster Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Foster Green. Michael Foster Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Latest developments in the matrics process. | 17 |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | Schizophrenia Revealed : From Neurons to Social Interactions | 32 |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | Schizophrenia from a neurocognitive perspective: Probing the impenetrable darkness. | 105 |
| 6 | 166 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: "The drift busters."breakdown → | 663 |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 42 |
About Michael Foster Green
Michael Foster Green is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (756 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (485 citations) and Philosophy (230 citations). Michael Foster Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Ventura, Andrew Shaner, Robert Paul Liberman, Keith H. Nuechterlein, Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Paul Satz, Marcel Kinsbourne, Patrick W. Corrigan, Jim Mintz and Gregory A. Light. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.