Michael Foster
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Transplantation top 5%
- Co-authors
- R.W. BlameyA G MorganR. P. BurdenDavid R. ThomasJohn F. DonohueDickon HayneM. J. S. DennisPeter W. Wenham
- Topics
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (6 papers)Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers)
- Cited by
- TransplantationUrologySurgery
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of CardiologyClinical Infectious DiseasesThe Journal of Urology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Michael Foster
20 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Surgery 250
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 130
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 92
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 87
- Transplantation 83
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Foster. The network helps show where Michael Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Foster. Michael Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Characteristics of cadaveric renal allograft recipients developing chronic rejection. | 21 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | The late results of renal transplantation and the importance of chronic rejection as a cause of graft loss. | 33 |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Michael Foster
Michael Foster is a scholar working on Transplantation, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (83 citations), Urology (50 citations) and Surgery (250 citations). Michael Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include R.W. Blamey, A G Morgan, R. P. Burden, David R. Thomas, John F. Donohue, Dickon Hayne, M. J. S. Dennis, Peter W. Wenham, P. A. Rowe and Richard Slack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Clinical Infectious Diseases and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.