Michael Fop

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Michael Fop is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Fop has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 3 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in Michael Fop's work include Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (12 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (7 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers). Michael Fop is often cited by papers focused on Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (12 papers), Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (7 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers). Michael Fop collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Italy and France. Michael Fop's co-authors include Thomas Brendan Murphy, Luca Scrucca, Adrian E. Raftery, Keith M. Smart, Enda Whyte, Noel McCaffrey, Siobhán O’Connor, Kieran Moran, Aisling Ní Annaidh and Michel Destrade and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Acta Biomaterialia and Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Michael Fop

17 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimati... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Fop Ireland 7 419 336 203 176 138 20 2.0k
Jochen Kruppa Germany 22 310 0.7× 281 0.8× 130 0.6× 189 1.1× 122 0.9× 47 2.0k
Skipper Seabold United States 3 493 1.2× 373 1.1× 154 0.8× 166 0.9× 254 1.8× 5 3.5k
Luca Scrucca Italy 20 584 1.4× 522 1.6× 320 1.6× 289 1.6× 258 1.9× 54 4.2k
Josef Perktold United States 3 493 1.2× 373 1.1× 154 0.8× 166 0.9× 255 1.8× 3 3.5k
David Welch New Zealand 27 570 1.4× 318 0.9× 279 1.4× 431 2.4× 85 0.6× 72 3.2k
Phillip Good Australia 31 291 0.7× 170 0.5× 111 0.5× 173 1.0× 84 0.6× 143 3.6k
Michael Friendly Canada 25 256 0.6× 582 1.7× 216 1.1× 131 0.7× 182 1.3× 87 3.4k
Gerhard Tutz Germany 9 162 0.4× 372 1.1× 216 1.1× 100 0.6× 203 1.5× 16 2.6k
Garrett Grolemund United States 8 152 0.4× 177 0.5× 317 1.6× 86 0.5× 201 1.5× 9 1.6k
Minoo Niknian United States 17 281 0.7× 129 0.4× 135 0.7× 162 0.9× 73 0.5× 22 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Fop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Fop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Fop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Fop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Fop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Fop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Fop. The network helps show where Michael Fop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Fop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Fop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Fop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Fop. Michael Fop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Hagan, Adrian, et al.. (2025). A Dirichlet stochastic block model for composition-weighted networks. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 211. 108204–108204. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gowen, Aoife, et al.. (2025). A consensus-constrained parsimonious Gaussian mixture model for clustering hyperspectral images. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. 19(2). 323–359.
3.
Tepole, Adrián Buganza, et al.. (2024). A machine learning approach to predict in vivo skin growth. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 17456–17456. 5 indexed citations
4.
Destrade, Michel, et al.. (2024). A Gaussian process approach for rapid evaluation of skin tension. Acta Biomaterialia. 182. 54–66. 4 indexed citations
5.
Fop, Michael, et al.. (2024). Sparse Model-Based Clustering of Three-Way Data via Lasso-Type Penalties. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 34(3). 1030–1050.
6.
Gormley, Isobel Claire, et al.. (2024). Variational inference for the latent shrinkage position model. Stat. 13(2).
7.
Gormley, Isobel Claire, et al.. (2023). A Latent Shrinkage Position Model for Binary and Count Network Data. Bayesian Analysis. 20(2). 4 indexed citations
8.
Price, Susan, et al.. (2023). Analysis of In Vivo Skin Anisotropy Using Elastic Wave Measurements and Bayesian Modelling. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 51(8). 1781–1794. 7 indexed citations
9.
Alfò, Marco, et al.. (2023). Model-based clustering for multidimensional social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society). 186(3). 481–507. 3 indexed citations
10.
Fop, Michael, et al.. (2022). Group-Wise Shrinkage Estimation in Penalized Model-Based Clustering. Journal of Classification. 39(3). 648–674. 3 indexed citations
11.
Fop, Michael, et al.. (2021). Unobserved classes and extra variables in high-dimensional discriminant\n analysis. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
12.
O’Connor, Siobhán, Noel McCaffrey, Enda Whyte, et al.. (2020). Can the Y balance test identify those at risk of contact or non-contact lower extremity injury in adolescent and collegiate Gaelic games?. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 23(10). 943–948. 10 indexed citations
13.
Fop, Michael, et al.. (2020). A stochastic block model for interaction lengths. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. 14(2). 485–512. 5 indexed citations
14.
Fop, Michael. (2018). Variable Selection for Latent Class Analysis [R package LCAvarsel version 1.1]. 2 indexed citations
15.
Fop, Michael, Thomas Brendan Murphy, & Luca Scrucca. (2018). Model-based clustering with sparse covariance matrices. Statistics and Computing. 29(4). 791–819. 20 indexed citations
16.
O’Connor, Siobhán, Noel McCaffrey, Enda Whyte, et al.. (2018). Is Poor Hamstring Flexibility a Risk Factor for Hamstring Injury in Gaelic Games?. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 28(7). 677–681. 7 indexed citations
17.
Fop, Michael & Thomas Brendan Murphy. (2018). Variable selection methods for model-based clustering. arXiv (Cornell University). 12(none). 62 indexed citations
18.
Scrucca, Luca, Michael Fop, Thomas Brendan Murphy, & Adrian E. Raftery. (2017). The mclust R package for clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. 175–175. 2 indexed citations
19.
Fop, Michael, Keith M. Smart, & Thomas Brendan Murphy. (2017). Variable selection for latent class analysis with application to low back pain diagnosis. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 11(4). 33 indexed citations
20.
Scrucca, Luca, Michael Fop, Thomas Brendan Murphy, & Adrian E. Raftery. (2016). mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models. The R Journal. 8(1). 289–289. 1794 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026