Michael Eckert

81 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Michael Eckert
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • History and Philosophy of Science 80
  • Theoretical Computer Science 18
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 111
  • Spectroscopy 134
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 211
Replace Marjorie Senechal with:
Marjorie Senechal United States
Karoline Wiesner Sweden
Diderik Batens Belgium
Hinne Hettema New Zealand
Jean Paul Van Bendegem Belgium
D. A. W. Hutchinson Canada
Mario Markus Germany
Thornton Page United States
Ludwig Boltzmann Austria
David B. Wilson United States
Michael Eckert relative to Marjorie Senechal United States Marjorie Senechal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Marjorie Senechal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Eckert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Eckert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Eckert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Eckert. The network helps show where Michael Eckert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Eckert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Eckert Line = papers co-authored together Michael Eckert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198857
2 198755
3 198746
4 198946
5 200932
6 198830
7 201329
8 201228
9 201127
10 201326
11
Reactivity on the web: paradigms and applications of the language XChange
200622
12 199320
13 200520
14
199620
15 201018
16 201417
17 198916
18 201816
19 199514
20 201013

About Michael Eckert

Michael Eckert is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems, having authored 101 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (14 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (11 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (9 papers), History of Science and Natural History (8 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (7 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers) and Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (80 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (18 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (111 citations), Spectroscopy (134 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 citations). Michael Eckert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georg Zuńdel, François Bry, Lillian Hoddeson, Gordon Baym, Friedrich C. Simmel, Eugene S. Kryachko, Michael Schöniger, G. L. Hofacker, G. Zundel and A Sommerfeld. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Annalen der Physik, Journal of Music Theory, The European Physical Journal Special Topics and Physics in Perspective.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact