Michael E. Tewes

2.5k total citations
87 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Michael E. Tewes is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael E. Tewes has authored 87 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 77 papers in Ecology, 16 papers in Genetics and 13 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Michael E. Tewes's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (71 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (28 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (23 papers). Michael E. Tewes is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (71 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (28 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (23 papers). Michael E. Tewes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Thailand. Michael E. Tewes's co-authors include Lon I. Grassman, Nova J. Silvy, Aaron M. Haines, Linda L. Laack, Jan E. Janečka, John H. Young, Jason V. Lombardi, Rodney L. Honeycutt, David G. Hewitt and Humberto L. Perotto‐Baldivieso and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Michael E. Tewes

83 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael E. Tewes United States 25 1.6k 463 304 234 212 87 1.9k
Peter G. Crawshaw Brazil 17 1.2k 0.8× 573 1.2× 209 0.7× 223 1.0× 185 0.9× 37 1.5k
Hugh S. Robinson United States 30 2.1k 1.3× 352 0.8× 442 1.5× 301 1.3× 226 1.1× 52 2.3k
Anah T. A. Jácomo Brazil 20 1.4k 0.9× 325 0.7× 443 1.5× 264 1.1× 199 0.9× 32 1.6k
Tharmalingam Ramesh South Africa 23 1.2k 0.7× 272 0.6× 331 1.1× 205 0.9× 225 1.1× 82 1.5k
Christine Breitenmoser‐Würsten Switzerland 24 1.4k 0.8× 537 1.2× 388 1.3× 281 1.2× 193 0.9× 47 1.7k
Rebecca J. Foster United States 21 1.5k 0.9× 338 0.7× 433 1.4× 372 1.6× 299 1.4× 44 1.8k
József Lanszki Hungary 26 1.3k 0.8× 419 0.9× 199 0.7× 202 0.9× 169 0.8× 98 1.6k
Jonathan C. Reynolds United Kingdom 15 1.7k 1.0× 331 0.7× 264 0.9× 289 1.2× 211 1.0× 30 1.9k
Natália Mundim Tôrres Brazil 23 1.3k 0.8× 358 0.8× 449 1.5× 252 1.1× 241 1.1× 59 1.7k
Daniel H. Pletscher United States 27 2.0k 1.2× 393 0.8× 254 0.8× 332 1.4× 201 0.9× 46 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Tewes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Tewes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Tewes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Tewes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Tewes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Tewes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Tewes. The network helps show where Michael E. Tewes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael E. Tewes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael E. Tewes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael E. Tewes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael E. Tewes. Michael E. Tewes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wester, David B., et al.. (2025). Influence of traffic volume on mammal beta diversity within the road effect zone. Biological Conservation. 311. 111428–111428. 1 indexed citations
2.
Scognamillo, Daniel G., et al.. (2025). Predicting species assemblages at wildlife crossing structures using multivariate regression of principal coordinates. PLoS ONE. 20(10). e0335193–e0335193.
3.
Lombardi, Jason V., et al.. (2025). Differences in mammal community response to highway construction across different levels of human land use. Wildlife Biology. 1 indexed citations
5.
Perotto‐Baldivieso, Humberto L., David B. Wester, Richard J. Kline, et al.. (2024). A multivariate approach to assessing landscape structure effects on wildlife crossing structure use. Ecological Processes. 13(1). 4 indexed citations
6.
Tanner, Evan P., et al.. (2023). Influence of abiotic factors on habitat selection of sympatric ocelots and bobcats: testing the interactive range-limit theory. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lombardi, Jason V., et al.. (2023). Examining the Spatial Structure of Woody Cover Within a Highway Road Effect Zone for Ocelots in Texas. Urban Ecosystems. 26(4). 1057–1069. 6 indexed citations
8.
Cherry, Michael J., et al.. (2023). Multiscale assessment of habitat selection and avoidance of sympatric carnivores by the endangered ocelot. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 8882–8882. 8 indexed citations
9.
Wester, David B., et al.. (2023). Distinguishing Buildings from Vegetation in an Urban-Chaparral Mosaic Landscape with LiDAR-Informed Discriminant Analysis. Remote Sensing. 15(6). 1703–1703. 7 indexed citations
10.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2022). If you build it, will they come? A comparative landscape analysis of ocelot roadkill locations and crossing structures. PLoS ONE. 17(5). e0267630–e0267630. 8 indexed citations
11.
Holbrook, Joseph D., C. Jane Anderson, Randy W. DeYoung, et al.. (2022). Multiscale habitat relationships of a habitat specialist over time: The case of ocelots in Texas from 1982 to 2017. Ecosphere. 13(8). 15 indexed citations
12.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2021). Cats, cars, and crossings: The consequences of road networks for the conservation of an endangered felid. Global Ecology and Conservation. 27. e01582–e01582. 18 indexed citations
13.
Leonard, John P., et al.. (2020). Effects of sun angle, lunar illumination, and diurnal temperature on temporal movement rates of sympatric ocelots and bobcats in South Texas. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0231732–e0231732. 16 indexed citations
14.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2017). Bobcat Predation on Quail, Birds, and Mesomammals. National Quail Symposium Proceedings. 5. 6 indexed citations
15.
Janečka, Jan E., et al.. (2014). Loss of Genetic Diversity among Ocelots in the United States during the 20th Century Linked to Human Induced Population Reductions. PLoS ONE. 9(2). e89384–e89384. 21 indexed citations
16.
Harveson, Louis A., et al.. (2012). Characteristics of two mountain lion Puma concolor populations in Texas, USA. Wildlife Biology. 18(1). 58–66. 6 indexed citations
17.
Holbrook, Joseph D., Randy W. DeYoung, Michael E. Tewes, & John H. Young. (2012). Demographic history of an elusive carnivore: using museums to inform management. Evolutionary Applications. 5(6). 619–628. 8 indexed citations
18.
Austin, Sean, et al.. (2010). Ecology and conservation of the leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis and clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 1–14. 32 indexed citations
19.
Grassman, Lon I., et al.. (2004). Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) Parasitizing Wild Carnivores in Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Journal of Parasitology. 90(3). 657–659. 18 indexed citations
20.
Weidemann, Thomas, Malte Wachsmuth, Michael E. Tewes, Karsten Rippe, & Jörg Langowski. (2002). Analysis of Ligand Binding by Two-Colour Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy. 3(1). 49–61. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026