John H. Young

797 total citations
44 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

John H. Young is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John H. Young has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 10 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in John H. Young's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (27 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (20 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers). John H. Young is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (27 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (20 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers). John H. Young collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Portugal. John H. Young's co-authors include Michael E. Tewes, Anjaneyulu Yerramilli, Aaron M. Haines, Linda L. Laack, Venkata Srinivas Challa, Jon S. Horne, Randy W. DeYoung, Joseph D. Holbrook, Venkata Bhaskar Rao Dodla and Hari Prasad Dasari and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

John H. Young

39 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John H. Young United States 16 307 197 180 93 88 44 606
Claudio Defila Switzerland 9 177 0.6× 112 0.6× 197 1.1× 120 1.3× 34 0.4× 18 546
Nathaniel Robinson United States 14 653 2.1× 110 0.6× 583 3.2× 43 0.5× 200 2.3× 32 1.0k
Travis Logan Canada 13 145 0.5× 114 0.6× 194 1.1× 35 0.4× 23 0.3× 26 622
Maximilian H. K. Hesselbarth United States 7 454 1.5× 32 0.2× 375 2.1× 82 0.9× 97 1.1× 11 828
Jenni L. McDonald United Kingdom 9 244 0.8× 54 0.3× 234 1.3× 12 0.1× 38 0.4× 14 592
Cory T. Overton United States 16 587 1.9× 50 0.3× 173 1.0× 57 0.6× 13 0.1× 50 751
Benjamin Bleyhl Germany 15 496 1.6× 95 0.5× 308 1.7× 8 0.1× 73 0.8× 20 666
Marco Sciaini Germany 3 473 1.5× 32 0.2× 380 2.1× 82 0.9× 95 1.1× 3 868
Ephraim Mwangomo Tanzania 10 345 1.1× 76 0.4× 179 1.0× 7 0.1× 85 1.0× 12 620
Polly C. Buotte United States 15 455 1.5× 103 0.5× 582 3.2× 15 0.2× 58 0.7× 22 927

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Young. The network helps show where John H. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Young. John H. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wester, David B., et al.. (2025). Influence of traffic volume on mammal beta diversity within the road effect zone. Biological Conservation. 311. 111428–111428. 1 indexed citations
3.
Scognamillo, Daniel G., et al.. (2025). Predicting species assemblages at wildlife crossing structures using multivariate regression of principal coordinates. PLoS ONE. 20(10). e0335193–e0335193.
4.
Lombardi, Jason V., et al.. (2025). Differences in mammal community response to highway construction across different levels of human land use. Wildlife Biology. 1 indexed citations
5.
Perotto‐Baldivieso, Humberto L., David B. Wester, Richard J. Kline, et al.. (2024). A multivariate approach to assessing landscape structure effects on wildlife crossing structure use. Ecological Processes. 13(1). 4 indexed citations
6.
Young, John H., et al.. (2024). Highway Crossing Rates of Wild Felids Before, During, and After Wildlife Crossing Structure Installation. Ecology and Evolution. 14(12). e70703–e70703.
8.
Rahman, Md Saydur, et al.. (2023). Use and effectiveness of wildlife exits designed for ocelots and other mesocarnivores on a south Texas highway. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lombardi, Jason V., et al.. (2023). Examining the Spatial Structure of Woody Cover Within a Highway Road Effect Zone for Ocelots in Texas. Urban Ecosystems. 26(4). 1057–1069. 6 indexed citations
10.
Wester, David B., et al.. (2023). Distinguishing Buildings from Vegetation in an Urban-Chaparral Mosaic Landscape with LiDAR-Informed Discriminant Analysis. Remote Sensing. 15(6). 1703–1703. 7 indexed citations
11.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2022). If you build it, will they come? A comparative landscape analysis of ocelot roadkill locations and crossing structures. PLoS ONE. 17(5). e0267630–e0267630. 8 indexed citations
12.
Holbrook, Joseph D., C. Jane Anderson, Randy W. DeYoung, et al.. (2022). Multiscale habitat relationships of a habitat specialist over time: The case of ocelots in Texas from 1982 to 2017. Ecosphere. 13(8). 15 indexed citations
13.
Lombardi, Jason V., Aaron M. Haines, Jan E. Janečka, et al.. (2022). Status and distribution of jaguarundi in Texas and Northeastern México: Making the case for extirpation and initiation of recovery in the United States. Ecology and Evolution. 12(3). e8642–e8642. 7 indexed citations
14.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2021). Cats, cars, and crossings: The consequences of road networks for the conservation of an endangered felid. Global Ecology and Conservation. 27. e01582–e01582. 18 indexed citations
15.
Tchounwou, Paul B., et al.. (2018). The status of geo-environmental health in Mississippi: Application of spatiotemporal statistics to improve health and air quality. AIMS environmental science. 5(4). 273–293. 3 indexed citations
16.
Meierhofer, Melissa B., Hsiao‐Hsuan Wang, William E. Grant, et al.. (2018). Use of Box-Beam Bridges as Day Roosts by Mexican Free-tailed Bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) in Texas. Southeastern Naturalist. 17(4). 605–605. 3 indexed citations
17.
Tewes, Michael E., et al.. (2017). Bobcat Predation on Quail, Birds, and Mesomammals. National Quail Symposium Proceedings. 5. 6 indexed citations
18.
Young, John H., et al.. (2016). Population Declines of Predatory Birds Coincident with the Introduction of Klerat Rodenticide in North Queensland. Australian field ornithology. 17(3). 6 indexed citations
19.
Holbrook, Joseph D., Randy W. DeYoung, Michael E. Tewes, & John H. Young. (2012). Demographic history of an elusive carnivore: using museums to inform management. Evolutionary Applications. 5(6). 619–628. 8 indexed citations
20.
Yerramilli, Anjaneyulu, Venkata Bhaskar Rao Dodla, Venkata Srinivas Challa, et al.. (2011). An integrated WRF/HYSPLIT modeling approach for the assessment of PM2.5 source regions over the Mississippi Gulf Coast region. Air Quality Atmosphere & Health. 5(4). 401–412. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026