Michael Dooley

185 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Michael Dooley
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.4k
  • Family Practice 319
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 203
  • Emergency Medical Services 511
  • Toxicology 139
Replace Robert J. Cipolle with:
Robert J. Cipolle United States
J. R. B. J. Brouwers Netherlands
Pierrick Bedouch France
Ingrid Sketris Canada
Michael A. Steinman United States
Sean M. Bagshaw Canada
Sean Hennessy United States
Johnson George Australia
Bertrand Guidet France
Chester B. Good United States
Michael Dooley relative to Robert J. Cipolle United States Robert J. Cipolle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Robert J. Cipolle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Dooley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Dooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Dooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Dooley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Dooley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Dooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Dooley. The network helps show where Michael Dooley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Dooley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Dooley Line = papers co-authored together Michael Dooley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 196 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015290
2 2004201
3 2016169
4 2014135
5 2010115
6 2015104
7 201780
8 200472
9 201170
10 200369
11 199968
12 201561
13 201360
14 200559
15 201653
16 201351
17 200048
18 200446
19 202346
20 201144

About Michael Dooley

Michael Dooley is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 196 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (75 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (46 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (20 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (18 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.4k citations), Family Practice (319 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (203 citations), Emergency Medical Services (511 citations) and Toxicology (139 citations). Michael Dooley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan Poole, Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick, Edwin C.K. Tan, J. Simon Bell, Natali Jokanovic, Kirsten Galbraith, Allen Cheng, Biswadev Mitra, Cristina Roman and Danny Rischin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, Supportive Care in Cancer, The Medical Journal of Australia, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy and Annals of Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact