Michael D. Maile

44 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Michael D. Maile
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 262
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 45
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 56
  • Emergency Medicine 56
  • Nephrology 44
Replace J. Gregory Modrall with:
J. Gregory Modrall United States
Αthanasios Katsargyris Germany
Ryash Vather New Zealand
Vasiliki Panagopoulou Greece
Mustafa Aydın Türkiye
Ehrenfried Schindler Germany
Stefano F. de Marchi Switzerland
Thomas Van Brussel Germany
R J Baigrie United Kingdom
Alice Bonomi Italy
Michael D. Maile relative to J. Gregory Modrall United States J. Gregory Modrall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
J. Gregory Modrall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Maile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Maile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Maile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Maile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Maile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Maile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Maile. The network helps show where Michael D. Maile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Maile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Maile Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Maile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201995
2 202091
3 200188
4 200487
5 201959
6 202256
7 200456
8 201536
9 202035
10 201627
11 201127
12 201626
13 201426
14 201825
15 201321
16 202020
17 201819
18 201815
19 201315
20 202015

About Michael D. Maile

Michael D. Maile is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Emergency Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 931 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (3 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (262 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (45 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (56 citations), Emergency Medicine (56 citations) and Nephrology (44 citations). Michael D. Maile has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Milo Engoren, Elizabeth S. Jewell, Lawrence I. Sinoway, Jianhua Li, Jonathan W. Haft, Brian T. Bateman, Sachin Kheterpal, Matthew Sigakis, Alexander Nakeff and Sandra A. Rempel. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Anesthesiology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Journal of Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact