Michael Cardamone

2.0k citations
39 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Cardamone

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Michael Cardamone
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Clinical Biochemistry 58
  • Physiology 203
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 98
  • Molecular Biology 452
  • Food Science 103
Replace Valentina Gelfanova with:
Valentina Gelfanova United States
Wei‐De Lin Taiwan
Jan W. Vrijbloed Switzerland
Eui Yul Choi South Korea
Marı́a A. Günther Sillero Spain
Hiroshi Ueno Japan
Heide Schmid Germany
Anders R. Karlström Sweden
Denise Galatis Australia
Kris Pauwels Belgium
Michael Cardamone relative to Valentina Gelfanova United States Valentina Gelfanova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Valentina Gelfanova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cardamone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cardamone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cardamone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cardamone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cardamone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cardamone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cardamone. The network helps show where Michael Cardamone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cardamone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cardamone Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cardamone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992425
2 2014102
3 201559
4 199543
5 201539
6 200837
7 201836
8 201835
9 201533
10 199231
11 201830
12 201724
13 201219
14 202314
15 200812
16 201612
17 199712
18 199411
19 20189
20 20188

About Michael Cardamone

Michael Cardamone is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (6 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (58 citations), Physiology (203 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (98 citations), Molecular Biology (452 citations) and Food Science (103 citations). Michael Cardamone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include N K Puri, John A. Lawson, Michelle A. Farrar, Maya Chopra, Danny Flanagan, David Mowat, Seán Kennedy, M R Brandon, Basil T. Darras and Genevieve Ho. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, The Medical Journal of Australia, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, EBioMedicine and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact