Michael C. Rea
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 28
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 19
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 4
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 7
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
- Co-authors
- Flint O. ThomasMichael J. MurrayMichael BergmannJeffrey E. BrowerLouis P. PojmanOliver D. CrispKelly James ClarkTrent Dougherty
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (4 papers)Analysis (4 papers)Noûs (3 papers)Faith and Philosophy (2 papers)Religious Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael C. Rea
52 papers receiving 698 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Philosophy 501
- History and Philosophy of Science 192
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 402
- Religious studies 45
- Cognitive Neuroscience 93
Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Rea
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Rea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Rea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Rea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Rea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Rea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Rea. The network helps show where Michael C. Rea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Rea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 11 | Trinity, incarnation, and atonement | 2009 | 3 |
| 12 | Analytic Theology : new essays in the philosophy of theology | 2009 | 19 |
| 13 | How Successful is Naturalism | 2007 | 6 |
| 14 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 19 | Supervenience and co-location | 1997 | 25 |
| 20 | 1970 | 52 |
About Michael C. Rea
Michael C. Rea is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Religious studies and General Psychology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (501 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (192 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (402 citations), Religious studies (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (93 citations). Michael C. Rea has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Flint O. Thomas, Michael J. Murray, Michael Bergmann, Jeffrey E. Brower, Louis P. Pojman, Oliver D. Crisp, Kelly James Clark, Michael J. Murray and Trent Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis, Noûs, Faith and Philosophy and Religious Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.