Michael C. Pitter

482 total citations
8 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Michael C. Pitter is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael C. Pitter has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael C. Pitter's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers). Michael C. Pitter is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers). Michael C. Pitter collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michael C. Pitter's co-authors include Serene S. Srouji, Helen B. Hubert, Thomas N. Payne, Julia S. Lehman, Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden, Patrick Anderson, Isabel C. Green, Nazema Y. Siddiqui, Megan E. Tarr and Elizabeth J. Geller and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Human Reproduction and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Michael C. Pitter

8 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael C. Pitter United States	8	219	203	142	87	42	8	358
Charbel Salamon United States	13	316 1.4×	73 0.4×	59 0.4×	44 0.5×	24 0.6×	33	422
Choon Pin Lim Singapore	8	104 0.5×	55 0.3×	52 0.4×	82 0.9×	74 1.8×	20	226
Philip Kaloo Australia	9	264 1.2×	90 0.4×	53 0.4×	7 0.1×	20 0.5×	15	339
Nikolaos Kathopoulis Greece	9	91 0.4×	90 0.4×	64 0.5×	6 0.1×	11 0.3×	63	238
Christian Phillips United Kingdom	9	209 1.0×	27 0.1×	30 0.2×	3 0.0×	6 0.1×	26	326
Amanjot S. Sethi United States	8	200 0.9×	49 0.2×		94 1.1×	19 0.5×	13	281
Fariba Behnia‐Willison Australia	8	190 0.9×	53 0.3×	39 0.3×	2 0.0×	3 0.1×	22	292
Madalena Pimenta Portugal	6	172 0.8×	12 0.1×	11 0.1×	4 0.0×	14 0.3×	14	211
Safwat Zaki United States	6	157 0.7×	37 0.2×		31 0.4×	12 0.3×	6	283
Zubair M. Butt United States	10	243 1.1×	16 0.1×		23 0.3×	18 0.4×	13	285

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Pitter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Pitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Pitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Pitter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Pitter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Pitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Pitter. The network helps show where Michael C. Pitter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael C. Pitter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael C. Pitter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael C. Pitter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael C. Pitter. Michael C. Pitter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Siddiqui, Nazema Y., Megan E. Tarr, Elizabeth J. Geller, et al.. (2016). Establishing Benchmarks For Minimum Competence With Dry Lab Robotic Surgery Drills. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 23(4). 633–638. 28 indexed citations

2.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2015). Fertility and Symptom Relief following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2015. 1–9. 31 indexed citations

3.

Siddiqui, Nazema Y., Michael Galloway, Elizabeth J. Geller, et al.. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 123(6). 1193–1199. 62 indexed citations

4.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2014). The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). e11–e11. 44 indexed citations

5.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2012). Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Human Reproduction. 28(1). 99–108. 78 indexed citations

6.

Payne, Thomas N. & Michael C. Pitter. (2011). Robotic-Assisted Surgery for the Community Gynecologist. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 54(3). 391–411. 27 indexed citations

7.

Payne, Thomas N., et al.. (2010). Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy in Patients With Large Uteri. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 115(3). 535–542. 36 indexed citations

8.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2008). Robotic‐assisted gynaecological surgery—establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 4(2). 114–120. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact