Michael C. Hutter

64 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael C. Hutter
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmacology 365
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 297
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 138
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Pharmacology 127
Replace John C. Hackett with:
John C. Hackett United States
Sandeep Modi United Kingdom
Richard Lonsdale Germany
Andreas H. Göller Germany
Markéta Paloncýová Czechia
Gaston Hui Bon Hoa France
Stefan Senger United Kingdom
Akifumi Oda Japan
Osman Güner United States
Patrik Rydberg Denmark
Michael C. Hutter relative to John C. Hackett United States John C. Hackett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John C. Hackett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Hutter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Hutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Hutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Hutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Hutter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Hutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Hutter. The network helps show where Michael C. Hutter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Hutter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Hutter Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Hutter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996154
2 2003108
3 200488
4 201050
5 199949
6 201748
7 200848
8 199846
9 200143
10 200640
11 202138
12 200337
13 201837
14 201236
15 200832
16 201232
17 201131
18 201831
19 199930
20 200228

About Michael C. Hutter

Michael C. Hutter is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (26 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (10 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (365 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (297 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (138 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations) and Pharmacology (127 citations). Michael C. Hutter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Clark, Rita Bernhardt, Volkhard Helms, Noel S. Hush, Jeffrey R. Reimers, Markus A. Lill, Josef Zapp, Frank Hannemann, David R. Trentham and Andreas Barth. Their work appears in journals such as ChemBioChem, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Future Medicinal Chemistry, FEBS Journal and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026