Michael C. Blumm
Impact in
-
- Environmental Conservation and Management
- American Environmental and Regional History
- Law top 2%
- Environmental law and policy
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Papers in
- Law 47
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine 35
- Environmental law and policy 19
- Legal principles and applications 7
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 36
- Environmental Conservation and Management 8
- Co-authors
- Mary Christina Wood (2 shared papers)Stephen R. Brown (1 shared paper)James A. Fraser (1 shared paper)Andrew S. Erickson (1 shared paper)Mary Turnipseed (1 shared paper)Joshua D. Smith (2 shared papers)Raphael D. Sagarin (1 shared paper)Peter H. Sand (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Natural resources journal (2 papers)Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development (1 paper)Denver law review (1 paper)Ecology law quarterly (6 papers)The Mathematics Enthusiast (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael C. Blumm
73 papers receiving 207 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 78
- Law 53
- Global and Planetary Change 84
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 39
- General Energy 2
Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Blumm
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Blumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Blumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Blumm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Blumm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Blumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Blumm. The network helps show where Michael C. Blumm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Blumm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "No Ordinary Lawsuit": Climate Change, Due Process, and the Public Trust Doctrine. | 2018 | 20 |
| 2 | Internationalizing the Public Trust Doctrine: Natural Law and Constitutional and Statutory Approaches to Fulifilling the Saxion Vision | 2011 | 14 |
| 3 | Public Choice Theory and the Public Lands: Why Multiple Use Failed | 2005 | 12 |
| 4 | The Public Trust Doctrine in Environmental and Natural Resources Law | 2013 | 10 |
| 5 | Lucas's Unlikely Legacy: The Rise of Background Principles as Categorical Takings Defenses | 2005 | 9 |
| 6 | The Fallacies of Free Market Environmentalism | 2006 | 8 |
| 7 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 10 | The Public Trust Doctrine - A Twenty-First Century Concept | 2009 | 6 |
| 11 | The Unraveling of the Parity Promise: Hydropower, Salmon, and Endangered Species in the Columbia Basin | 1991 | 6 |
| 12 | Federal wetlands protection under the Clean Water Act: Regulatory ambivalence, intergovernmental tension, and a call for reform | 1989 | 6 |
| 13 | The Decline of the Hydropower Czar and the Rise of Agency Pluralism in Hydroelectric Licensing | 2001 | 5 |
| 14 | Saving Snake River Water and Salmon Simultaneously: The Biological, Economic, and Legal Case for Breaching the Lower Snake River Dams, Lowering John Day Reservoir, and Restoring Natural River Flows | 1998 | 5 |
| 15 | Hydropower vs. Salmon: The Struggle of the Pacific Northwest's Anadromous Fish Resources for a Peaceful Coexistence with the Federal Columbia River Power System | 1981 | 5 |
| 16 | Native American Natural Resources Law | 2002 | 5 |
| 17 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 18 | The Pioneer Spirit and the Public Trust: The American Rule of Capture and State Ownership of Wildlife | 2005 | 4 |
| 19 | Pluralism and the Environment: The Role of Comment Agencies in NEPA Litigation | 2005 | 4 |
| 20 | The Indian Treaty Piscary Profit and Habitat Protection in the Pacific Northwest: A Property Rights Approach | 2005 | 4 |
About Michael C. Blumm
Michael C. Blumm is a scholar working on Law, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 86 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (36 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (35 papers), Environmental law and policy (19 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (8 papers), Legal principles and applications (7 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (7 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (78 citations), Law (53 citations), Global and Planetary Change (84 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (39 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Michael C. Blumm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mary Christina Wood, Stephen R. Brown, James A. Fraser, Andrew S. Erickson, Mary Turnipseed, Joshua D. Smith, Raphael D. Sagarin, Peter H. Sand, Daniel J. Rohlf and Marla Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Natural resources journal, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, Denver law review, Ecology law quarterly and The Mathematics Enthusiast.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.