Michael Ariel

1.6k total citations
64 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Michael Ariel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Ariel has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Molecular Biology, 33 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Michael Ariel's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (36 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (20 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (15 papers). Michael Ariel is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (36 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (20 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (15 papers). Michael Ariel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Spain. Michael Ariel's co-authors include N. W. Daw, Nigel W. Daw, Alexander F. Rosenberg, Naoki Kogo, Alan R. Adolph, Ryan K. Rader, Stuart C. Mangel, John E. Dowling, Michael A. Sandberg and Eric M. Lasater and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Michael Ariel

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Ariel United States 18 975 928 493 126 119 64 1.4k
L. R. Stanford United States 16 683 0.7× 570 0.6× 453 0.9× 59 0.5× 141 1.2× 18 1.1k
Andrew P. Mariani United States 26 1.5k 1.5× 1.8k 1.9× 404 0.8× 53 0.4× 239 2.0× 34 2.0k
V.A. Casagrande United States 25 727 0.7× 643 0.7× 1.1k 2.2× 129 1.0× 161 1.4× 45 1.6k
Masao Tachibana Japan 22 1.7k 1.8× 1.7k 1.8× 438 0.9× 59 0.5× 114 1.0× 41 2.1k
Edward R. Gruberg United States 18 681 0.7× 554 0.6× 404 0.8× 73 0.6× 30 0.3× 44 1.1k
Clyde W. Oyster United States 18 1.2k 1.3× 1.4k 1.5× 726 1.5× 108 0.9× 246 2.1× 20 1.8k
Ellen S. Takahashi United States 16 933 1.0× 1.1k 1.2× 616 1.2× 83 0.7× 234 2.0× 22 1.5k
Martin Wilson United States 16 1.2k 1.2× 1.0k 1.1× 319 0.6× 53 0.4× 24 0.2× 33 1.4k
Robert Siminoff United States 12 411 0.4× 330 0.4× 344 0.7× 81 0.6× 72 0.6× 49 812
Marilee P. Ogren United States 11 471 0.5× 337 0.4× 780 1.6× 100 0.8× 50 0.4× 17 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ariel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ariel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ariel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ariel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ariel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ariel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ariel. The network helps show where Michael Ariel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Ariel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Ariel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Ariel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Ariel. Michael Ariel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ariel, Michael, et al.. (2023). Responses of the in vitro turtle brain to visual and auditory stimuli during severe hypoxia. Journal of Experimental Biology. 226(7). 2 indexed citations
2.
Wright, Nathaniel C., et al.. (2015). Turtle Dorsal Cortex Pyramidal Neurons Comprise Two Distinct Cell Types with Indistinguishable Visual Responses. PLoS ONE. 10(12). e0144012–e0144012. 14 indexed citations
3.
Ariel, Michael, et al.. (2009). Topography of Purkinje Cells and Other Calbindin-Immunoreactive Cells Within Adult and Hatchling Turtle Cerebellum. The Cerebellum. 8(4). 463–476. 3 indexed citations
4.
Brown, Michael E. & Michael Ariel. (2008). Topography and Response Timing of Intact Cerebellum Stained With Absorbance Voltage-Sensitive Dye. Journal of Neurophysiology. 101(1). 474–490. 12 indexed citations
5.
Ariel, Michael & Manu Ben‐Johny. (2007). Analysis of quantal size of voltage responses to retinal stimulation in the accessory optic system. Brain Research. 1157. 41–55. 1 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Michael S. & Michael Ariel. (2006). The effects of unilateral eighth nerve block on fictive VOR in the turtle. Brain Research. 1094(1). 149–162. 2 indexed citations
7.
Martin, John R. & Michael Ariel. (2005). Localization of GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) markers in the turtle's basal optic nucleus. Brain Research. 1066(1-2). 109–119. 2 indexed citations
8.
Tolbert, D.L., et al.. (2004). Quantitative analysis of granule cell axons and climbing fiber afferents in the turtle cerebellar cortex. Anatomy and Embryology. 209(1). 49–58. 10 indexed citations
9.
Ariel, Michael & Naoki Kogo. (2004). Shunting Inhibition in Accessory Optic System Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 93(4). 1959–1969. 5 indexed citations
10.
Ariel, Michael, et al.. (2003). Bilateral processing of vestibular responses revealed by injecting lidocaine into the eighth cranial nerve in vitro. Brain Research. 999(1). 106–117. 4 indexed citations
11.
Martin, John R., et al.. (2003). Connectivity of the turtle accessory optic system. Brain Research. 989(1). 76–90. 5 indexed citations
12.
Kogo, Naoki, et al.. (2002). Synaptic pharmacology in the turtle accessory optic system. Experimental Brain Research. 147(4). 464–472. 9 indexed citations
13.
Rosenberg, Alexander F. & Michael Ariel. (1998). Analysis of direction-tuning curves of neurons in the turtle's accessory optic system. Experimental Brain Research. 121(4). 361–370. 10 indexed citations
14.
Rosenberg, Alexander F. & Michael Ariel. (1996). A model for optokinetic eye movements in turtles that incorporates properties of retinal-slip neurons. Visual Neuroscience. 13(2). 375–383. 9 indexed citations
15.
Ariel, Michael, et al.. (1993). A low-cost VGA-based visual stimulus generation and control system. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 46(2). 147–157. 12 indexed citations
16.
Balaban, Carey D. & Michael Ariel. (1992). A “beat-to-beat” interval generator for optokinetic nystagmus. Biological Cybernetics. 66(3). 203–216. 14 indexed citations
17.
Ariel, Michael & Alexander F. Rosenberg. (1991). Effects of synaptic drugs on turtle optokinetic nystagmus and the spike responses of the basal optic nucleus. Visual Neuroscience. 7(5). 431–440. 11 indexed citations
18.
Ariel, Michael. (1990). Independent eye movements in the turtle. Visual Neuroscience. 5(1). 29–41. 17 indexed citations
19.
Rosenberg, Alexander F., et al.. (1990). Retinal direction-sensitive input to the accessory optic system: an in vitro approach with behavioral relevance. Brain Research. 522(1). 161–164. 14 indexed citations
20.
Grasse, K.L., Michael Ariel, & Ian D. Smith. (1990). Direction-selective responses of units in the dorsal terminal nucleus of cat following intravitreal injections of bicuculline. Visual Neuroscience. 4(6). 605–617. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026