Michael A. Mata
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 9
- Community Health and Development 3
- Homelessness and Social Issues 3
- Health 10
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 10
- Co-authors
- Kathryn Pitkin Derose (17 shared papers)Jennifer Hawes-Dawson (8 shared papers)David E. Kanouse (7 shared papers)Karen R. Flórez (7 shared papers)Malcolm Williams (6 shared papers)Laura M. Bogart (3 shared papers)Peter Mendel (4 shared papers)Beth Ann Griffin (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Health Promotion (2 papers)AIDS and Behavior (2 papers)AIDS Education and Prevention (1 paper)Journal of Religion and Health (1 paper)Contemporary Clinical Trials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Michael A. Mata
15 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Health 108
- Infectious Diseases 143
- General Health Professions 181
- Epidemiology 83
- Sociology and Political Science 102
Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Mata
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Mata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Mata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Mata. The network helps show where Michael A. Mata may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Mata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 |
About Michael A. Mata
Michael A. Mata is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Infectious Diseases, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (10 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (9 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (6 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (108 citations), Infectious Diseases (143 citations), General Health Professions (181 citations), Epidemiology (83 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (102 citations). Michael A. Mata has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Pitkin Derose, Jennifer Hawes-Dawson, David E. Kanouse, Karen R. Flórez, Malcolm Williams, Laura M. Bogart, Peter Mendel, Beth Ann Griffin, Ricky N. Bluthenthal and Denise D. Payán. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health Promotion, AIDS and Behavior, AIDS Education and Prevention, Journal of Religion and Health and Contemporary Clinical Trials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.