Michael A. Bowers

3.1k total citations
53 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Michael A. Bowers is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael A. Bowers has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Ecology, 28 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 19 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Michael A. Bowers's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (31 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (26 papers). Michael A. Bowers is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (31 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (26 papers). Michael A. Bowers collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Michael A. Bowers's co-authors include James H. Brown, James Dooley, David R. Bowne, Stephen F. Matter, H. Duane Smith, James E. Hines, Sanford D. Porter, Daniel B. Thompson, Edward F. Connor and Anthony E. Ellis and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Michael A. Bowers

53 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael A. Bowers United States 29 1.7k 1.3k 980 357 315 53 2.5k
W. R. J. Dean South Africa 23 859 0.5× 998 0.8× 616 0.6× 449 1.3× 264 0.8× 93 1.9k
Enrique H. Bucher Argentina 25 984 0.6× 822 0.6× 566 0.6× 414 1.2× 214 0.7× 96 1.9k
David C. Paton Australia 27 1.3k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 1.4k 1.4× 219 0.6× 430 1.4× 63 2.5k
John R. Tester United States 28 1.7k 1.0× 902 0.7× 438 0.4× 666 1.9× 212 0.7× 70 2.5k
Henry A. Hespenheide United States 16 837 0.5× 651 0.5× 1.1k 1.1× 235 0.7× 306 1.0× 83 1.9k
Peter L. Meserve United States 39 2.9k 1.7× 1.9k 1.5× 1.0k 1.1× 696 1.9× 222 0.7× 88 4.0k
Martin Brändle Germany 29 1.1k 0.6× 1.0k 0.8× 942 1.0× 294 0.8× 465 1.5× 60 2.3k
Louis B. Best United States 33 2.5k 1.5× 1.4k 1.1× 922 0.9× 664 1.9× 92 0.3× 92 3.6k
Joseph M. Wunderle Puerto Rico 32 2.2k 1.3× 1.5k 1.2× 1.2k 1.2× 765 2.1× 188 0.6× 103 3.5k
Barry J. Fox Australia 34 2.1k 1.2× 1.8k 1.4× 637 0.7× 857 2.4× 296 0.9× 73 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Bowers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Bowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Bowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Bowers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Bowers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Bowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Bowers. The network helps show where Michael A. Bowers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael A. Bowers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael A. Bowers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael A. Bowers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael A. Bowers. Michael A. Bowers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shaner, Pei‐Jen Lee, Michael A. Bowers, & Stephen A. Macko. (2007). GIVING-UP DENSITY AND DIETARY SHIFTS IN THE WHITE-FOOTED MOUSE, PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS. Ecology. 88(1). 87–95. 25 indexed citations
2.
Bowne, David R., Michael A. Bowers, & James E. Hines. (2006). Connectivity in an Agricultural Landscape as Reflected by Interpond Movements of a Freshwater Turtle. Conservation Biology. 20(3). 780–791. 71 indexed citations
3.
Bowne, David R. & Michael A. Bowers. (2004). Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecology. 19(1). 1–20. 160 indexed citations
4.
Bowers, Michael A. & Gary W. Barrett. (1999). Synthesis: A Review of the Science and Prescriptions for the Future. 313–337. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bowers, Michael A. & James Dooley. (1999). . Landscape Ecology. 14(4). 381–389. 45 indexed citations
6.
Bowers, Michael A., et al.. (1996). Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals. Oecologia. 108(1). 182–191. 34 indexed citations
7.
Bowers, Michael A., et al.. (1996). Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales. Oecologia. 105(1). 107–115. 64 indexed citations
8.
Dooley, James & Michael A. Bowers. (1996). Influences of Patch Size and Microhabitat on the Demography of Two Old-Field Rodents. Oikos. 75(3). 453–453. 33 indexed citations
9.
Bowers, Michael A.. (1994). Dynamics of Age- and Habitat-Structured Populations. Oikos. 69(2). 327–327. 20 indexed citations
10.
Bowers, Michael A. & James Dooley. (1993). Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects. Oecologia. 94(2). 247–254. 124 indexed citations
11.
Bowers, Michael A. & James H. Brown. (1992). Structure in a desert rodent community: use of space around Dipodomys spectabilis mounds. Oecologia. 92(2). 242–249. 20 indexed citations
12.
Bowers, Michael A. & James Dooley. (1991). Landscape Composition and the Intensity and Outcome of Two-Species Competition. Oikos. 60(2). 180–180. 28 indexed citations
13.
Bowers, Michael A.. (1990). Exploitation of Seed Aggregates by Merriam's Kangaroo Rat: Harvesting Rates and Predatory Risk. Ecology. 71(6). 2334–2344. 48 indexed citations
14.
Bowers, Michael A., D. Welch, & Timothy G. Carr. (1990). Home range size adjustments by the eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus, in response to natural and manipulated water availability. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68(9). 2016–2020. 23 indexed citations
15.
Bowers, Michael A.. (1988). Relationships between Local Distribution and Geographic Range of Desert Heteromyid Rodents. Oikos. 53(3). 303–303. 10 indexed citations
16.
Connor, Edward F. & Michael A. Bowers. (1987). The spatial consequences of interspecific competition. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 24(3). 213–226. 39 indexed citations
17.
Bowers, Michael A., Daniel B. Thompson, & James H. Brown. (1987). Spatial organization of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal. Oecologia. 72(1). 77–82. 66 indexed citations
18.
Bowers, Michael A.. (1985). Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae). Oecologia. 67(2). 224–230. 26 indexed citations
19.
Bowers, Michael A.. (1984). POPULATION BIOLOGY OF BUMBLEBEES (BOMBUS) IN SUBALPINE MEADOWS IN NORTHEASTERN UTAH (COMMUNITY, COMPETITION, LIFE-HISTORY).. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations
20.
Munger, James C., Michael A. Bowers, & W. Thomas Jones. (1983). DESERT RODENT POPULATIONS: FACTORS AFFECTING ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND GENETIC STRUCTURE. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 7(1). 7. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026