John R. Tester
- Ecology top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Small Animals top 1%
- Co-authors
- Susan M. GalatowitschRichard M. LehtinenNancy J. HuntlyRichard S. InouyeDavid TilmanDonald B. SiniffOrrin J. RongstadM. A. Stillwell
- Topics
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management (16 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (10 papers)
- Journals
- EcologyOecologiaBioScience
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John R. Tester
69 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Ecology 1.7k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 902
- Global and Planetary Change 666
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 438
- Small Animals 311
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Tester
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Tester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Tester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Tester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Tester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Tester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Tester. The network helps show where John R. Tester may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Tester
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Tester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Tester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Tester. John R. Tester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 87 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 90 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 132 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | Equipment and Methods for Radio Tracking Freshwater Fish | 28 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 136 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | A study of certain plant and animal interrelations on a native prairie in northwestern Minnesota. | 41 |
| 20 | 5 |
About John R. Tester
John R. Tester is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals and Ecology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (16 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (902 citations), Ecology (1.7k citations) and Ecological Modeling (265 citations). John R. Tester has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Galatowitsch, Richard M. Lehtinen, Nancy J. Huntly, Richard S. Inouye, David Tilman, Donald B. Siniff, Orrin J. Rongstad, M. A. Stillwell, Pamela J. Pietz and L. David Mech. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Oecologia and BioScience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.