Mia Romano

470 citations
19 papers · 310 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mia Romano

19 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Mia Romano
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Clinical Psychology 149
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
  • Social Psychology 64
Replace Julie M. Petersen with:
Julie M. Petersen United States
Johanna M. Meyer United States
Alicia A. Hughes United States
Susanna Payne United Kingdom
Ki Eun Shin United States
Dana Carsley Canada
Kristin E. Austin United States
Laura O’Toole United States
Erica Crome Australia
Ali Sarkohi Sweden
Mia Romano relative to Julie M. Petersen United States Julie M. Petersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Julie M. Petersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mia Romano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mia Romano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mia Romano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mia Romano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mia Romano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mia Romano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mia Romano. The network helps show where Mia Romano may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Mia Romano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mia Romano Line = papers co-authored together Mia Romano links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201558
2 201441
3 201940
4 201834
5 201925
6 201919
7 201719
8 201915
9 202012
10 202010
11 20219
12 20165
13 20185
14 20214
15 20204
16 20183
17 20193
18 20183
19 20211

About Mia Romano

Mia Romano is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (149 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations) and Social Psychology (64 citations). Mia Romano has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Lorna Peters, David A. Moscovitch, Jonathan D. Huppert, Morris Moscovitch, Gordon Parker, Rebecca Graham, Amelia Paterson, Vanja Vidovic, Ruofan Ma and Lauren F. McLellan. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Psychotherapy Research, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact