M.H. Richmond

2.3k citations
52 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

M.H. Richmond

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

M.H. Richmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Molecular Medicine 352
  • Endocrinology 90
  • Pharmacology 289
  • Biotechnology 145
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
Replace J. Davies with:
J. Davies United States
W. Wehrli Switzerland
H. R. Perkins United Kingdom
Harry Taber United States
Edward Steers United States
Fred E. Hahn United States
James J. Burchall United States
P. Giesbrecht Germany
J. B. Ward Tanzania
Rollin D. Hotchkiss United States
M.H. Richmond relative to J. Davies United States J. Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Richmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Richmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Richmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Richmond. The network helps show where M.H. Richmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside M.H. Richmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.H. Richmond Line = papers co-authored together M.H. Richmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Essays in applied microbiology
198118
2 19815
3 19801
4
The cell as a habitat.
19796
5
beta-lactamase insensitive or inhibitory beta-lactams: two approaches to the challenge of ampicillin-resistant E. coli.
19783
6 19774
7 197520
8 197466
9 19701
10 196451
11 196428
12 196229
13 19625
14 196266
15 196140
16 196143
17 195924
18 195918
19 195939
20 195915

About M.H. Richmond

M.H. Richmond is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolism and Applications (7 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (4 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (352 citations), Endocrinology (90 citations), Pharmacology (289 citations), Biotechnology (145 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). M.H. Richmond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include James F. Collins, L. Fowden, Naomi Datta, M. R. Pollock, C. L. HARTLEY, Lesley Farrell, Christina Neumann, T. D. Hennessey, W. A. Gillespie and M. T. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology, Nature, Journal of Medical Microbiology, Journal of Molecular Biology and Journal of Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026