M.H. Fraser
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research
Papers in
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 16
-
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility 2
- Co-authors
- Kenneth J. HuntAndrew N. McLeanDavid AllanThomas SchauerSuzanne GrantBrian GardnerMark D. SmithF. Derry
- Journals
- Spinal Cord (5 papers)Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (2 papers)Clinical Anatomy (1 paper)Injury (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
M.H. Fraser
30 papers receiving 748 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Rehabilitation 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 281
- Psychiatry and Mental health 153
- Biomedical Engineering 305
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 121
Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Fraser. The network helps show where M.H. Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.H. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 121 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 14 | Workrate and cadence control for exercise testing in FES cycling | 2003 | 2 |
| 15 | An apparatus for FES-assisted arm-cranking exercise in tetraplegia | 2002 | 1 |
| 16 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 18 | FES cycling with electric motor assist | 2002 | 1 |
| 19 | Robust control of knee-joint motion | 2001 | 5 |
| 20 | 1998 | 124 |
About M.H. Fraser
M.H. Fraser is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Therapy, Surgery, Human-Computer Interaction and Rehabilitation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (16 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (11 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (110 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (281 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (153 citations), Biomedical Engineering (305 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (121 citations). M.H. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth J. Hunt, Andrew N. McLean, David Allan, Thomas Schauer, Suzanne Grant, Brian Gardner, Mark D. Smith, F. Derry, C A Glass and W W Dinsmore. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Clinical Anatomy, Injury and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.