M.H. Anil

1.3k total citations
43 papers, 892 citations indexed

About

M.H. Anil is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, M.H. Anil has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 892 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 10 papers in Small Animals and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in M.H. Anil's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (22 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (4 papers). M.H. Anil is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (22 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (4 papers). M.H. Anil collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Australia. M.H. Anil's co-authors include J. M. Forbes, J.L. McKinstry, Jean Claude Mbanya, Seth Love, Chris R. Helps, S.B. Wotton, D. A. Harbour, P.E. Whittington, H.W. Symonds and R. G. Rodway and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physiology, British Journal Of Nutrition and Meat Science.

In The Last Decade

M.H. Anil

42 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M.H. Anil United Kingdom	18	427	238	215	169	159	43	892
Antoni Dalmau Spain	28	1.2k 2.8×	263 1.1×	1.3k 6.0×	113 0.7×	388 2.4×	101	2.0k
S.B. Wotton United Kingdom	29	1.1k 2.5×	35 0.1×	483 2.2×	201 1.2×	119 0.7×	88	2.0k
TJ Gibson United Kingdom	18	413 1.0×	35 0.1×	493 2.3×	73 0.4×	110 0.7×	51	861
Diedrich Smidt Germany	16	415 1.0×	387 1.6×	594 2.8×	60 0.4×	343 2.2×	127	1.2k
M. A. Diekman United States	17	392 0.9×	445 1.9×	294 1.4×	95 0.6×	231 1.5×	56	1.2k
J.L. McKinstry United Kingdom	16	512 1.2×	30 0.1×	314 1.5×	123 0.7×	57 0.4×	37	778
Emma Fàbrega Spain	20	794 1.9×	130 0.5×	767 3.6×	52 0.3×	195 1.2×	61	1.1k
M.A. Gerritzen Netherlands	20	713 1.7×	43 0.2×	431 2.0×	50 0.3×	59 0.4×	47	1.1k
H. L. Self United States	17	343 0.8×	260 1.1×	249 1.2×	78 0.5×	271 1.7×	56	837
A. B. M. Raj United Kingdom	21	806 1.9×	35 0.1×	461 2.1×	32 0.2×	88 0.6×	52	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Anil

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Anil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Anil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Anil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Anil

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Anil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Anil. The network helps show where M.H. Anil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.H. Anil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.H. Anil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.H. Anil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.H. Anil. M.H. Anil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Velarde, Antonio, Pablo Serrano Rodríguez, Antoni Dalmau, et al.. (2013). Religious slaughter: Evaluation of current practices in selected countries. Meat Science. 96(1). 278–287. 58 indexed citations

Love, Seth, et al.. (2004). Dissemination of Brain Emboli following Captive Bolt Stunning of Sheep: Capacity for Entry into the Systemic Arterial Circulation. Journal of Food Protection. 67(5). 1050–1052. 7 indexed citations

Love, Seth, et al.. (2004). Frequency of Brain Tissue Embolism Associated with Captive Bolt Gun Stunning of Sheep. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 1(4). 291–294. 5 indexed citations

McKinstry, J.L. & M.H. Anil. (2003). The effect of repeat application of electrical stunning on the welfare of pigs. Meat Science. 67(1). 121–128. 25 indexed citations

Anil, M.H., Seth Love, Chris R. Helps, & D. A. Harbour. (2002). Potential for carcass contamination with brain tissue following stunning and slaughter in cattle and sheep. Food Control. 13(6-7). 431–436. 42 indexed citations

Anil, M.H., A. B. M. Raj, & J.L. McKinstry. (2000). Evaluation of electrical stunning in commercial rabbits. Meat Science. 54(3). 217–220. 13 indexed citations

Anil, M.H., P.E. Whittington, & J.L. McKinstry. (2000). The effect of the sticking method on the welfare of slaughter pigs. Meat Science. 55(3). 315–319. 19 indexed citations

Love, Seth, Chris R. Helps, Alan G. Shand, et al.. (2000). Methods for detection of haematogenous dissemination of brain tissue after stunning of cattle with captive bolt guns. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 99(1-2). 53–58. 24 indexed citations

Anil, M.H., A. B. M. Raj, & J.L. McKinstry. (1998). Electrical stunning in commercial rabbits: Effective currents, spontaneous physical activity and reflex behaviour. Meat Science. 48(1-2). 21–28. 13 indexed citations

10.

Anil, M.H. & J.L. McKinstry. (1998). Variations in electrical stunning tong placements andrelative consequences in slaughter pigs. The Veterinary Journal. 155(1). 85–90. 27 indexed citations

11.

Anil, M.H., et al.. (1997). Lack of Evidence for Stress Being Caused to Pigs by Witnessing the Slaughter of Conspecifics. Animal Welfare. 6(1). 3–8. 14 indexed citations

12.

Gregory, N. G., et al.. (1996). Prevalence and duration of insensibility following electrical stunning in calves. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 44(1). 1–3. 8 indexed citations

13.

Anil, M.H., J.L. McKinstry, S.B. Wotton, & N. G. Gregory. (1995). Welfare of calves — 1. Investigations into some aspects of calf slaughter. Meat Science. 41(2). 101–112. 25 indexed citations

14.

Anil, M.H., Jean Claude Mbanya, H.W. Symonds, & J. M. Forbes. (1993). Responses in the voluntary intake of hay or silage by lactating cows to intraruminal infusions of sodium acetate or sodium propionate, the tonicity of rumen fluid or rumen distension. British Journal Of Nutrition. 69(3). 699–712. 53 indexed citations

15.

Mbanya, Jean Claude, M.H. Anil, & J. M. Forbes. (1993). The voluntary intake of hay and silage by lactating cows in response to ruminal infusion of acetate or propionate, or both, with or without distension of the rumen by a balloon. British Journal Of Nutrition. 69(3). 713–720. 51 indexed citations

16.

Wotton, S.B., M.H. Anil, P.E. Whittington, & J.L. McKinstry. (1992). Pig slaughtering procedures: Head-to-back stunning. Meat Science. 32(3). 245–255. 28 indexed citations

17.

Anil, M.H. & J.L. McKinstry. (1992). The effectiveness of high frequency electrical stunning in pigs. Meat Science. 31(4). 481–491. 29 indexed citations

18.

Anil, M.H. & J. M. Forbes. (1988). THE ROLES OF HEPATIC NERVES IN THE REDUCTION OF FOOD INTAKE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTRAPORTAL SODIUM PROPIONATE ADMINISTRATION IN SHEEP. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology. 73(4). 539–546. 56 indexed citations

19.

Anil, M.H., et al.. (1987). Effects of intraportal infusion of glucose and lysine on food intake in intact and hepatic-vagotomized chickens. Appetite. 9(1). 65–72. 8 indexed citations

20.

Anil, M.H. & J. M. Forbes. (1987). Neural control and neurosensory functions of the liver. Proceedings of The Nutrition Society. 46(1). 125–133. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact