Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Development top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Calvert W. JonesStéphanie C. HofmannOliver WesterwinterDaniel VerdierJ. C. SharmanNina Hall
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers)International Development and Aid (10 papers)Political Conflict and Governance (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
30 papers receiving 542 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Political Science and International Relations 362
- Sociology and Political Science 258
- Development 198
- Strategy and Management 89
- Economics and Econometrics 38
Countries citing papers authored by Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni. The network helps show where Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni. Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 79 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Debates on European integration : a reader | 16 |
| 20 | 26 |
About Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni
Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 30 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers), International Development and Aid (10 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (198 citations), Political Science and International Relations (362 citations) and Strategy and Management (89 citations). Mette Eilstrup‐Sangiovanni has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Calvert W. Jones, Stéphanie C. Hofmann, Oliver Westerwinter, Daniel Verdier, J. C. Sharman and Nina Hall. Their work appears in journals such as International Studies Quarterly, International Security and Journal of European Public Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.