Mette Dahl

578 citations
19 papers · 463 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mette Dahl

19 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Mette Dahl
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Reproductive Medicine 123
  • Cancer Research 174
  • Immunology 235
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 73
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 48
Replace Maria Rosa Guglielmino with:
Maria Rosa Guglielmino Italy
Petra Bilinski United States
Mariann Koel Estonia
Carly Cuman Australia
J.S. Fitzgerald Germany
Christine Guillard France
Csaba Papp United States
Soraya Labied Belgium
L Louwe Netherlands
Bliss Magella United States
Mette Dahl relative to Maria Rosa Guglielmino Italy Maria Rosa Guglielmino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Maria Rosa Guglielmino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mette Dahl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Dahl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Dahl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Dahl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Dahl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Dahl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Dahl. The network helps show where Mette Dahl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mette Dahl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mette Dahl Line = papers co-authored together Mette Dahl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018112
2 201165
3 201245
4 201836
5 201431
6 201529
7 201028
8 201525
9 202125
10 201424
11 202121
12 201712
13 20232
14 20192
15 20172
16 20161
17 20111
18 20221
19 20141

About Mette Dahl

Mette Dahl is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive System and Pregnancy (11 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (7 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (123 citations), Cancer Research (174 citations), Immunology (235 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (73 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (48 citations). Mette Dahl has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Vauvert F. Hviid, Lasse S. Kristensen, Kirsten Grønbæk, Jørgen Kjems, Snezana Djurisic, Iben Daugaard, Thomas B. Hansen, Rudi Steffensen, Ole Bjarne Christiansen and Anita Veihe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Reproductive Immunology, Human Immunology, Leukemia, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Laboratory Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact