Merijn Bruijnes

458 total citations
29 papers, 213 citations indexed

About

Merijn Bruijnes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Merijn Bruijnes has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 213 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Social Psychology, 16 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 7 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Merijn Bruijnes's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (13 papers), AI in Service Interactions (10 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers). Merijn Bruijnes is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (13 papers), AI in Service Interactions (10 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers). Merijn Bruijnes collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Ireland. Merijn Bruijnes's co-authors include Gijs Huisman, Dirk Heylen, Willem‐Paul Brinkman, Siska Fitrianie, Radosław Niewiadomski, Maurizio Mancini, Deborah Richards, Andrea Bönsch, Mariët Theune and Jan Flokstra and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Psychology and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

In The Last Decade

Merijn Bruijnes

28 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Merijn Bruijnes Netherlands 10 114 84 48 48 37 29 213
Martijn H. Vastenburg Netherlands 9 67 0.6× 15 0.2× 47 1.0× 121 2.5× 8 0.2× 18 305
Mohammad Mavadati United States 4 85 0.7× 55 0.7× 144 3.0× 50 1.0× 6 0.2× 8 279
Christiana Tsiourti Austria 7 116 1.0× 76 0.9× 85 1.8× 39 0.8× 5 0.1× 13 247
Thibaud Sénéchal United States 7 74 0.6× 59 0.7× 260 5.4× 35 0.7× 9 0.2× 11 385
Byung-Chull Bae South Korea 11 34 0.3× 89 1.1× 26 0.5× 78 1.6× 5 0.1× 30 261
Xipei Ren China 9 79 0.7× 18 0.2× 16 0.3× 92 1.9× 5 0.1× 48 248
Xueshuang Wang China 9 96 0.8× 33 0.4× 59 1.2× 19 0.4× 13 0.4× 19 239
Cesco Willemse Italy 7 125 1.1× 16 0.2× 49 1.0× 17 0.4× 19 0.5× 11 234
Matt Liewer United States 7 31 0.3× 23 0.3× 13 0.3× 65 1.4× 15 0.4× 11 162
Marcos Maroto‐Gómez Spain 8 134 1.2× 116 1.4× 32 0.7× 15 0.3× 4 0.1× 24 221

Countries citing papers authored by Merijn Bruijnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merijn Bruijnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merijn Bruijnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merijn Bruijnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merijn Bruijnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merijn Bruijnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merijn Bruijnes. The network helps show where Merijn Bruijnes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Merijn Bruijnes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Merijn Bruijnes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Merijn Bruijnes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Merijn Bruijnes. Merijn Bruijnes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2025). The Artificial Social Agent Questionnaire (ASAQ) — Development and evaluation of a validated instrument for capturing human interaction experiences with artificial social agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 199. 103482–103482. 4 indexed citations
2.
Grundmann, Sonja, et al.. (2025). Lilobot: A Cognitive Conversational Agent to Train Counsellors at Children’s Helplines. Journal of Medical Systems. 49(1). 5–5.
3.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2023). Mandarin Chinese translation of the Artificial-Social-Agent questionnaire instrument for evaluating human-agent interaction. Frontiers in Computer Science. 5. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2023). Reducing social diabetes distress with a conversational agent support system: a three-week technology feasibility evaluation. Frontiers in Digital Health. 5. 1149374–1149374. 6 indexed citations
5.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2022). The multimodal EchoBorg: not as smart as it looks. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces. 16(3). 293–302. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2022). Finding what fits: Explorative self-experimentation for health behaviour change. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 6(3). 345–366. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2022). Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 16193–16193. 10 indexed citations
8.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2022). The artificial-social-agent questionnaire. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–8. 12 indexed citations
9.
Mancini, Maurizio, et al.. (2020). Room for one more? - Introducing Artificial Commensal Companions. Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland). 1–8. 16 indexed citations
10.
Niewiadomski, Radosław, et al.. (2020). Eating with an Artificial Commensal Companion. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 312–316. 9 indexed citations
11.
Fitrianie, Siska, Merijn Bruijnes, Deborah Richards, Andrea Bönsch, & Willem‐Paul Brinkman. (2020). The 19 Unifying Questionnaire Constructs of Artificial Social Agents. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 1–8. 19 indexed citations
12.
Fitrianie, Siska, et al.. (2019). What are We Measuring Anyway?. University of Twente Research Information. 159–161. 11 indexed citations
13.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2019). What are we measuring anyway?: A literature survey of questionnaires used in studies reported in the intelligent virtual agent conferences. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
14.
Bruijnes, Merijn, Gijs Huisman, & Dirk Heylen. (2016). Tasty tech. University of Twente Research Information. 1–6. 20 indexed citations
15.
Ufkes, Elze Gooitzen, et al.. (2016). Interviewing Suspects with Avatars: Avatars Are More Effective When Perceived as Human. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 545–545. 6 indexed citations
16.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2015). The recognition of acted interpersonal stance in police interrogations and the influence of actor proficiency. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces. 9(4). 353–376. 1 indexed citations
17.
Bruijnes, Merijn, et al.. (2013). Interpersonal stance in police interviews: content analysis. 3(2 Pt 1). 193–216. 5 indexed citations
18.
Akker, Rieks op den, et al.. (2013). The recognition of acted interpersonal stance in police interrogations. University of Twente Research Information. 4. 65–70. 3 indexed citations
19.
Akker, Rieks op den & Merijn Bruijnes. (2012). Computational models of social and emotional turn-taking for embodied conversational agents: a review. CTIT technical report series. 3 indexed citations
20.
Bruijnes, Merijn. (2012). Social and Emotional Turn Taking for Embodied Conversational Agents. University of Twente Research Information. 977–978. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026