Meredith Johnston

786 total citations
17 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Meredith Johnston is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith Johnston has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Meredith Johnston's work include Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers) and Ear and Head Tumors (4 papers). Meredith Johnston is often cited by papers focused on Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers) and Ear and Head Tumors (4 papers). Meredith Johnston collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Meredith Johnston's co-authors include John Kim, Eugene Yu, Brian O’Sullivan, Bayardo Perez‐Ordoñez, John Kim, Ralph Gilbert, Jonathan C. Irish, David P. Goldstein, Eshetu G. Atenafu and Danny Rischin and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Meredith Johnston

16 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Meredith Johnston Australia 8 189 175 69 52 41 17 288
Janjira Petsuksiri Thailand 10 153 0.8× 119 0.7× 123 1.8× 70 1.3× 6 0.1× 28 354
Christopher J. Balamucki United States 8 181 1.0× 138 0.8× 63 0.9× 204 3.9× 26 0.6× 11 341
Mitesh Gandhi Australia 11 163 0.9× 152 0.9× 123 1.8× 158 3.0× 8 0.2× 29 379
John R. Austin United States 12 239 1.3× 245 1.4× 69 1.0× 88 1.7× 73 1.8× 22 476
Lady Paola Aristizábal Arboleda Brazil 9 62 0.3× 45 0.3× 62 0.9× 15 0.3× 45 1.1× 27 278
Takashi Yoshizumi Japan 11 118 0.6× 394 2.3× 189 2.7× 72 1.4× 15 0.4× 27 516
Aaron Pederson United States 7 89 0.5× 137 0.8× 82 1.2× 15 0.3× 22 0.5× 9 244
Tyler A. Janz United States 9 106 0.6× 113 0.6× 127 1.8× 23 0.4× 8 0.2× 26 302
Timothy J. Eviston Australia 11 182 1.0× 340 1.9× 99 1.4× 34 0.7× 92 2.2× 16 500
Grażyna Wyszyńska–Pawelec Poland 9 87 0.5× 163 0.9× 30 0.4× 25 0.5× 95 2.3× 54 272

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Johnston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Johnston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Johnston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Johnston. The network helps show where Meredith Johnston may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith Johnston

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith Johnston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith Johnston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith Johnston. Meredith Johnston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Lee, Mark, et al.. (2023). Assessment of interfraction dose variation in pancreas SBRT using daily simulation MR images. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 46(4). 1619–1627.
2.
Arumugam, Sankar, et al.. (2022). The delivered dose assessment in pancreas SBRT with the target position determined using an in-house position monitoring system. Frontiers in Oncology. 12. 1009916–1009916. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lee, Mark, Michael Jameson, Meredith Johnston, et al.. (2022). Identifying the location of locoregional recurrences after definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer using metabolic parameters of baseline and mid‐treatment 18F‐FDG‐PET scans. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 67(1). 89–97. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ellis, Rebecca J. Bartlett, Rebecca W.Y. Ko, Sankar Arumugam, et al.. (2022). Correcting rotational error in rectal cancer radiation therapy: Can planning target volume margins be safely reduced?. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 69(4). 473–483. 3 indexed citations
5.
Ng, Weng, Meredith Johnston, Yafeng Ma, et al.. (2020). An Australian Three-Centre Feasibility Study of Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Collection of Baseline Circulating Tumor Cells. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 108(3). e644–e644. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kuballa, Anna, Marco Geraci, Meredith Johnston, & Dario Sorrentino. (2020). The Gut Microbial Profile of Preclinical Crohn’s Disease Is Similar to That of Healthy Controls. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 26(11). 1682–1690. 5 indexed citations
7.
Sorrentino, Dario, Anna Kuballa, Marco Geraci, & Meredith Johnston. (2019). Tu1778 – The Gut Microbial Profile of Preclinical Crohn's Disease is Similar to that of Healthy Controls. Gastroenterology. 156(6). S–1120. 1 indexed citations
8.
Liney, Gary, Robba Rai, Pan Li, et al.. (2018). Comparison of four dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in abdominal radiotherapy planning. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 7. 70–75. 14 indexed citations
9.
McDowell, Lachlan, Mathias Bressel, Vanessa Estall, et al.. (2016). Outcomes of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with parotid metastases. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 60(5). 668–676. 25 indexed citations
10.
Banks, Patricia, Shahneen Sandhu, David Gyorki, Meredith Johnston, & Danny Rischin. (2016). Recent Insights and Advances in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Oncology Practice. 12(7). 637–646. 19 indexed citations
12.
Erović, Boban M., Manish D. Shah, G. Bruch, et al.. (2015). Outcome analysis of 215 patients with parotid gland tumors: A retrospective cohort analysis. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 44(1). 43–43. 39 indexed citations
13.
Johnston, Meredith, Shao Hui Huang, John Waldron, et al.. (2015). Salivary duct carcinoma: Treatment, outcomes, and patterns of failure. Head & Neck. 38(S1). E820–6. 80 indexed citations
14.
Johnston, Meredith, Linxin Guo, Michael Back, et al.. (2013). Intensity‐modulated radiotherapy using simultaneous‐integrated boost for definitive treatment of locally advanced mucosal head and neck cancer: Outcomes from a single‐institution series. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 57(3). 356–363. 7 indexed citations
15.
Johnston, Meredith, Eugene Yu, & John Kim. (2012). Perineural invasion and spread in head and neck cancer. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 12(3). 359–371. 54 indexed citations
16.
Johnston, Meredith, Philip Vial, Linda Bell, et al.. (2011). Daily Online Bony Correction is Required for Prostate Patients Without Fiducial Markers or Soft-tissue Imaging. Clinical Oncology. 23(7). 454–459. 8 indexed citations
17.
Johnston, Meredith, John Waldron, Eshetu G. Atenafu, et al.. (2011). Salivary Duct Carcinoma: Treatment, Outcomes and Clinico-pathological Review. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 81(2). S526–S526. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026