Menno Fraters

419 total citations
12 papers, 203 citations indexed

About

Menno Fraters is a scholar working on Geophysics, Condensed Matter Physics and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Menno Fraters has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 203 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Geophysics, 1 paper in Condensed Matter Physics and 1 paper in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in Menno Fraters's work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (7 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers). Menno Fraters is often cited by papers focused on High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (7 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers). Menno Fraters collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and Netherlands. Menno Fraters's co-authors include Wim Spakman, Cédric Thieulot, Anne Glerum, Wolfgang Bangerth, M. I. Billen, Stephan C. Kramer, Henri Samuel, Christian Hüttig, Claudia Stein and Nicola Tosi and has published in prestigious journals such as Geophysical Journal International, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems and Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth.

In The Last Decade

Menno Fraters

12 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Menno Fraters

GEOPH

CM

GEOLO

AS

MM

Petra Maierová Czechia

Shuo Xue China

Shunguo Wang United States

Narayan Bose India

Jens Oeser Germany

William Agudelo Colombia

Farhad Sobouti Iran

Kazuhiko Goto Japan

M. J. Daines United States

Petra Maierová Czechia

Menno Fraters

274 ×1.5

GEOPH

11 ×0.8

CM

14 ×1.2

GEOLO

7 ×0.6

AS

11 ×1.1

MM

Citations per year, relative to Menno Fraters Menno Fraters (= 1×) peers Petra Maierová

Countries citing papers authored by Menno Fraters

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Menno Fraters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Menno Fraters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Menno Fraters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Menno Fraters

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Menno Fraters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Menno Fraters. The network helps show where Menno Fraters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Menno Fraters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Menno Fraters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Menno Fraters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Menno Fraters. Menno Fraters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Fraters, Menno, et al.. (2025). Using Subducting Plate Motion to Constrain Cascadia Slab Geometry and Interface Strength. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 26(5). 1 indexed citations

2.

Fraters, Menno, et al.. (2024). The Geodynamic World Builder: A planetary structurecreator for the geosciences. The Journal of Open Source Software. 9(101). 6671–6671. 1 indexed citations

3.

Király, Ágnés, et al.. (2024). The Importance of Anisotropic Viscosity in Numerical Models, for Olivine Textures in Shear and Subduction Deformations. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 2(1). 1 indexed citations

4.

Dannberg, Juliane, et al.. (2023). High‐Resolution Mantle Flow Models Reveal Importance of Plate Boundary Geometry and Slab Pull Forces on Generating Tectonic Plate Motions. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 128(8). 6 indexed citations

5.

Fraters, Menno & M. I. Billen. (2021). On the Implementation and Usability of Crystal Preferred Orientation Evolution in Geodynamic Modeling. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 22(10). 9 indexed citations

6.

Bangerth, Wolfgang, et al.. (2021). ASPECT v2.3.0. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 13 indexed citations

7.

Fraters, Menno, Wolfgang Bangerth, Cédric Thieulot, Anne Glerum, & Wim Spakman. (2019). Efficient and practical Newton solvers for non-linear Stokes systems in geodynamic problems. Geophysical Journal International. 218(2). 873–894. 24 indexed citations

8.

Fraters, Menno, et al.. (2019). The Geodynamic World Builder: a solution for complex initial conditions in numerical modeling. Solid Earth. 10(5). 1785–1807. 17 indexed citations

9.

Glerum, Anne, et al.. (2018). Nonlinear viscoplasticity in ASPECT: benchmarking and applications to subduction. Solid Earth. 9(2). 267–294. 82 indexed citations

10.

Fraters, Menno, Wolfgang Bangerth, Cédric Thieulot, & Wim Spakman. (2017). Newton Solver Stabilization for Stokes Solvers in Geodynamic Problems. EGUGA. 13556. 1 indexed citations

11.

Glerum, Anne, et al.. (2017). Implementing nonlinear viscoplasticity in ASPECT: benchmarkingand applications to 3D subduction modeling. 2 indexed citations

12.

Tosi, Nicola, Claudia Stein, Lena Noack, et al.. (2015). A community benchmark for viscoplastic thermal convection in a 2‐D square box. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 16(7). 2175–2196. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact