Meng Meng

56 total papers · 458 total citations
36 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

Meng Meng is a scholar working on Surgery, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Meng Meng has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine and 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Meng Meng's work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). Meng Meng is often cited by papers focused on Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). Meng Meng collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Denmark. Meng Meng's co-authors include Xiangsheng Zhang, Rimo Xi, Yu Zhang, Yongmei Yin, Zhonghai Li, Ming Yang, Yu‐Feng Zang, Zi‐Jian Feng, Na Zhao and Ying Jing and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Analytica Chimica Acta and Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Meng Meng

33 papers receiving 294 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Meng Meng	87	45	36	35	32	36	294
Sara Ramezani	95 1.1×	34 0.8×	31 0.9×	24 0.7×	64 2.0×	30	309
Tao Liu	111 1.3×	17 0.4×	32 0.9×	23 0.7×	30 0.9×	26	317
Di Hu	52 0.6×	32 0.7×	40 1.1×	38 1.1×	36 1.1×	34	342
Farqad B. Hamdan	36 0.4×	17 0.4×	36 1.0×	29 0.8×	19 0.6×	43	334
Changgeng Song	122 1.4×	35 0.8×	21 0.6×	29 0.8×	45 1.4×	32	335
Haoxiang Jiang	45 0.5×	63 1.4×	19 0.5×	23 0.7×	21 0.7×	30	296
Ying Shen	81 0.9×	20 0.4×	30 0.8×	15 0.4×	18 0.6×	27	311
Yao Chen	72 0.8×	56 1.2×	60 1.7×	8 0.2×	33 1.0×	32	351
Yan Zhang	45 0.5×	21 0.5×	43 1.2×	10 0.3×	36 1.1×	35	361
Qing Huang	54 0.6×	19 0.4×	26 0.7×	17 0.5×	37 1.2×	35	339

Countries citing papers authored by Meng Meng

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meng Meng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meng Meng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meng Meng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meng Meng

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meng Meng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meng Meng. The network helps show where Meng Meng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meng Meng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meng Meng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meng Meng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meng Meng. Meng Meng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact