Melvin Sabshin
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Danuta EhrlichRue BucherAnselm StraussLeonard SchatzmanEliot FreidsonDaniel OfferDerek L. PhillipsH. Keith H. Brodie
- Topics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Melvin Sabshin
44 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Clinical Psychology 880
- Social Psychology 446
- General Health Professions 361
- Sociology and Political Science 332
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 307
Countries citing papers authored by Melvin Sabshin
This map shows the geographic impact of Melvin Sabshin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melvin Sabshin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melvin Sabshin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melvin Sabshin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melvin Sabshin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melvin Sabshin. The network helps show where Melvin Sabshin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melvin Sabshin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melvin Sabshin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melvin Sabshin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melvin Sabshin. Melvin Sabshin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychiatry in the new millennium | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Psychiatric diagnosis and normality. | 2 |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Normality and the life cycle : a critical integration | 26 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 67 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About Melvin Sabshin
Melvin Sabshin is a scholar working on General Psychology, Philosophy and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (880 citations), General Psychology (47 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (307 citations). Melvin Sabshin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Danuta Ehrlich, Rue Bucher, Anselm Strauss, Leonard Schatzman, Eliot Freidson, Daniel Offer, Derek L. Phillips, H. Keith H. Brodie, Carolyn B. Mueller and David K. Marcus. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.