Melvin Ching
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- A. Negro‐VilarMarcelo Moraes ValênçaFrancisco J. LópezIstván MerchenthalerCraig A. JohnstonMaria DufauMichael S. BlankRobert D. Utiger
- Topics
- Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (12 papers)Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (7 papers)Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandCameroon
In The Last Decade
Melvin Ching
21 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Reproductive Medicine 327
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 198
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 161
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 113
- Social Psychology 90
Countries citing papers authored by Melvin Ching
This map shows the geographic impact of Melvin Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melvin Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melvin Ching more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melvin Ching
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melvin Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melvin Ching. The network helps show where Melvin Ching may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melvin Ching
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melvin Ching. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melvin Ching based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melvin Ching. Melvin Ching is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 160 | |
| 3 | 45 | |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 71 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Melvin Ching
Melvin Ching is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Reproductive Medicine and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 22 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (12 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (7 papers) and Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (327 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (113 citations). Melvin Ching has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include A. Negro‐Vilar, Marcelo Moraes Valênça, Francisco J. López, István Merchenthaler, Craig A. Johnston, Maria Dufau, Michael S. Blank, Robert D. Utiger, Richard J. Krieg and Paul Schalch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Brain Research and Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.