Melissa R. Gilbert
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Urban Studies top 2%
- Transportation top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Michele MasucciJanice MonkCindi KatzAlfred A. BovéCarol J. HomkoVíctor Hugo Gutiérrez-VélezJocelyn E. BehmMeghan Cope
- Topics
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers)Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenColombia
In The Last Decade
Melissa R. Gilbert
19 papers receiving 628 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 390
- Geography, Planning and Development 105
- Urban Studies 98
- Transportation 90
- General Health Professions 82
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa R. Gilbert
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa R. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa R. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa R. Gilbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa R. Gilbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa R. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa R. Gilbert. The network helps show where Melissa R. Gilbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melissa R. Gilbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melissa R. Gilbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melissa R. Gilbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melissa R. Gilbert. Melissa R. Gilbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Information and Communication Technology Geographies: Strategies for Bridging the Digital Divide | 12 |
| 10 | 107 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 75 | |
| 20 | 143 |
About Melissa R. Gilbert
Melissa R. Gilbert is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Communication and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 21 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (105 citations), Urban Studies (98 citations) and Transportation (90 citations). Melissa R. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Michele Masucci, Janice Monk, Cindi Katz, Alfred A. Bové, Carol J. Homko, Víctor Hugo Gutiérrez-Vélez, Jocelyn E. Behm, Meghan Cope, Hallie Eakin and Hamil Pearsall. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health & Place and Economic Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.