Melina Shackell

428 citations
9 papers · 296 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Melina Shackell

8 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Melina Shackell
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 158
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
  • Family Practice 3
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 35
  • Emergency Medicine 12
Replace J Kozłowski with:
J Kozłowski United States
Alessandro Cartei Italy
Win K. Shen United States
Pedro Conthe Gutiérrez Spain
Arturo Vilches‐Moraga United Kingdom
Felipe Costa Fuchs Brazil
Niklas Ekerstad Sweden
Sunitha Viswanathan India
Arnfinn Rollag Norway
Christian Klem United States
Melina Shackell relative to J Kozłowski United States J Kozłowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J Kozłowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melina Shackell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melina Shackell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melina Shackell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melina Shackell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melina Shackell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melina Shackell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melina Shackell. The network helps show where Melina Shackell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melina Shackell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melina Shackell Line = papers co-authored together Melina Shackell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Prevalence of heart failure in three general practices in north west London.
1992114
2 201743
3 198543
4 201935
5 201924
6 197924
7 20188
8 20225
9 20170

About Melina Shackell

Melina Shackell is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (1 paper), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (1 paper) and Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (158 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations), Family Practice (3 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (35 citations) and Emergency Medicine (12 citations). Melina Shackell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include George C. Sutton, Andrew D. Richardson, Jayan Parameshwar, P A Poole-Wilson, Elizabeth H. Skinner, L Mockus, Christine E. Wright, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Keith A.A. Fox and Terry Haines. Their work appears in journals such as Heart, Critical Care Medicine, Trials, BMC Health Services Research and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact