Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013
2017380 citationsChukwuweike U. Gwam, Jaydev B. Mistry et al.The Journal of Arthroplastyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Melbin Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melbin Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melbin Thomas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melbin Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melbin Thomas. The network helps show where Melbin Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melbin Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melbin Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melbin Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Melbin Thomas. Melbin Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mistry, Jaydev B., Morad Chughtai, Chukwuweike U. Gwam, et al.. (2018). Decreasing the Incidence of Surgical-Site Infections After Total Joint Arthroplasty.. PubMed. 46(6). E374–E387.31 indexed citations
6.
Gwam, Chukwuweike U., Jaydev B. Mistry, Anton Khlopas, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of Adductor Canal Blockade Compared to Multimodal Peri-Articular Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.. PubMed. 30. 300–305.6 indexed citations
7.
Gwam, Chukwuweike U., Jaydev B. Mistry, Nequesha S. Mohamed, et al.. (2017). Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 32(7). 2088–2092.380 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Gwam, Chukwuweike U., Jaydev B. Mistry, Nicolás S. Piuzzi, et al.. (2017). What Influences How Patients with Depression Rate Hospital Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty?. PubMed. 30. 373–378.13 indexed citations
9.
Gwam, Chukwuweike U., Nequesha S. Mohamed, Jaydev B. Mistry, et al.. (2017). Pain Management with Adductor Canal Blockade or Multimodal Periarticular Analgesia in Elderly Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.. PubMed. 30. 352–358.5 indexed citations
Chughtai, Morad, Anton Khlopas, Melbin Thomas, et al.. (2017). Development of an Encompassing Questionnaire for Evaluating the Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.. PubMed. 30. 306–313.3 indexed citations
Mistry, Jaydev B., Morad Chughtai, Randa K. Elmallah, et al.. (2016). Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 17(1). 1–6.94 indexed citations
Thomas, Melbin, et al.. (1976). [Hypoglycemic complications of oral drug therapy of diabetes mellitus. 21 cases].. PubMed. 5(14). 906–10.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.