Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya
This map shows the geographic impact of Mehmet Çetin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mehmet Çetin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mehmet Çetin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mehmet Çetin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mehmet Çetin. The network helps show where Mehmet Çetin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mehmet Çetin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mehmet Çetin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mehmet Çetin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mehmet Çetin. Mehmet Çetin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2021). The chancing of Mg concentrations in some plants grown in Pakistan depends on plant spcies and the growing environment.4 indexed citations
8.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2020). Amatör Olarak Spor Yapan Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sportmenlik Yönelimlerinin İncelenmesi. 3(1). 29–34.6 indexed citations
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2019). The Investigation of the Changing in Conccentration of Some Heavy Metals in Seeds, Leaves, and Branches because of Traffic Density: a Case Study of Acer Platanoides. 5(2). 83–92.3 indexed citations
11.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2019). The Possibilities of Using Blue Spruce (Picea Pungens Engelm) as a Biomonitor by Measuring the Recent Accumulation of Mn in Its Leaves. DergiPark (Istanbul University).9 indexed citations
12.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2018). The variable of leaf micromorphogical characters on grown in distinct climate conditions in some landscape plants. Fresenius environmental bulletin.56 indexed citations
Kaya, Latif Gürkan, et al.. (2018). Environmental outdoor plant preferences: a practical approach for choosing outdoor plants in urban or suburban residential areas in Antalya, Turkey.. Fresenius environmental bulletin. 27(12). 7945–7952.19 indexed citations
15.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2016). Restoration Process of Kastamonu - Tufekciler Village Houses for Potential Eco-Tourism Purposes. 3(11).1 indexed citations
16.
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2011). The relationship between reaction time and decision-making in elite kickboxing athletes.. World Applied Sciences Journal. 12(10). 1826–1831.4 indexed citations
Çetin, Mehmet, et al.. (2009). Conversion possibilities of oak (Quercus sp. L.) coppices into high forests in Bartin, Turkey.. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 11(15). 51–59.3 indexed citations
Karaca, Orhan, et al.. (1991). BRONZ IRKI HİNDİLERİN KAPALI VE AÇIK YETİŞTİRME KOŞULLARINDA GELİŞME VE KARKAS ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜZERİNDE ARAŞTIRMALAR. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(2). 82–96.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.